An Augmented Reality Learning Toolkit for Fostering Spatial Ability in Mathematics Lesson: Design and Development

Bilal Ozcakir 1 * , Erdinc Cakiroglu 2
More Detail
1 Alanya Alaaddin Keykubat University, Faculty of Education, TURKEY
2 Middle East Technical University, Faculty of Education, TURKEY
* Corresponding Author
EUR J SCI MATH ED, Volume 9, Issue 4, pp. 145-167.
OPEN ACCESS   159 Views   119 Downloads
Download Full Text (PDF)


Previous research claimed that integration of augmented reality on educational settings helps to improve academic achievement of students in collaborative learning environments, as well as to improve their retention and ability to translate this within other environments. Since augmented reality is still considered relatively novel technology in educational fields, there is an inherent need for research-based guides to design effective and feasible augmented reality tools for school-based learning. The main aim of this study was therefore to design and develop an augmented reality learning toolkit to foster spatial ability in middle school students using mobile devices. The study was conducted in two parts, as preliminary research and a prototyping phase. The findings guided the characteristics for designing an augmented reality learning toolkit with a set of spatial tasks aimed at middle school students. In light of the results, it can be inferred that the students were able to use this designed toolkit to perform their spatial ability through given spatial tasks since the students encountered no technical difficulties with the final toolkit prototype, and that they were able to use the toolkit assuredly. In conclusion, the study showed that augmented reality seemed helpful in enhancing the usage of mobile devices, not just for the reading of books, communication or playing games, but also as a support mechanism for the learning of mathematics. Thus, the augmented reality toolkit developed in this study presents a new way for students and/or teachers to use mobile devices in the learning and teaching of mathematics.


Ozcakir, B., & Cakiroglu, E. (2021). An Augmented Reality Learning Toolkit for Fostering Spatial Ability in Mathematics Lesson: Design and Development. European Journal of Science and Mathematics Education, 9(4), 145-167.


  • Alcañiz, M., Contero, M., Pérez-López, D. C., & Ortega, M. (2010). Augmented reality technology for education. In S. Soomro (Ed.), New achievements in technology education and development (pp. 247-256). InTech.
  • Azuma, R. T. (1997). A survey of augmented reality. Presence-Teleoperators and Virtual Environments, 6(4), 355-385.
  • Battista, M. T. (1990). Spatial visualization and gender differences in high school geometry. Journal for Research in Mathematics Education, 21(1), 47-60.
  • Battista, M. T. (1994). On Greeno’s environmental/model view of conceptual domains: A spatial/geometric perspective. Journal for Research in Mathematics Education, 25(1), 86-99.
  • Battista, M. T. (2007). The Development of Geometric and Spatial Thinking. In F. K. Lester (Ed.), Second handbook of research on mathematics teaching and learning. Information Age Publishing.
  • Billinghurst, M., & Kato, H. (2002). Collaborative augmented reality. Communications of the ACM, 45(7), 64-70.
  • Chen, Y. (2019). Effect of Mobile Augmented Reality on Learning Performance, Motivation, and Math Anxiety in a Math Course. Journal of Educational Computing Research, 57(7), 1695-1722.
  • Creswell, J. W., & Poth, C. N. (2016). Qualitative inquiry and research design: Choosing among five approaches. Sage publications.
  • Demitriadou, E., Stavroulia, K.-E., & Lanitis, A. (2020). Comparative evaluation of virtual and augmented reality for teaching mathematics in primary education. Education and Information Technologies, 25(1), 381-401.
  • Dünser, A., Steinbügl, K., Kaufmann, H., & Glück, J. (2006). Virtual and augmented reality as spatial ability training tools. Proceedings of the 7th ACM SIGCHI New Zealand chapter’s international conference on Computer-human interaction: design centered HCI, New York, NY.
  • Elsayed, S. A., & Al-Najrani, H. I. (2021). Effectiveness of the augmented reality on improving the visual thinking in mathematics and academic motivation for middle school students. Eurasia Journal of Mathematics, Science and Technology Education, 17(8), em1991.
  • Fennema, E., & Sherman, J. (1977). Sex-related differences in mathematics achievement, spatial visualization and affective factors. American Educational Journal, 14(1), 51-71.
  • Flores-Bascuñana, M., Diago, P. D., Villena-Taranilla, R., & Yáñez, D. F. (2020). On augmented reality for the learning of 3D-geometric contents: A preliminary exploratory study with 6-grade primary students. Education Sciences, 10(1), 4.
  • Frank, J. A., & Kapila, V. (2017). Mixed-reality learning environments: Integrating mobile interfaces with laboratory test-beds. Computers & Education, 110, 88-104.
  • Guay, R. B. (1977). Purdue spatial visualization test - Visualization of rotations. Purdue Research Foundation.
  • Hedley, N. (2003). Empirical evidence for advanced geographic visualization interface use. International Cartographic Congress: Cartographic Renaissance, Durban, South Africa.
  • Kaufmann, H. (2004). Geometry education with augmented reality [Doctoral dissertation, Vienna University of Technology]. Vienna, Austria.
  • Kaufmann, H., & Schmalstieg, D. (2002). Mathematics and geometry education with collaborative augmented reality. ACM SIGGRAPH 2002 conference abstracts and applications, San Antonio, Texas.
  • Lai, E. R. (2011). Collaboration: A literature review.
  • Linn, M. C., & Petersen, A. C. (1985). Emergence and characterisation of gender differences in spatial abilities: A meta-analysis. Child Development, 56, 1479-1498.
  • Lohman, D. F. (1993). Spatial Ability and G First Spearman Seminar, Iowa City, Iowa.
  • Maier, P. H. (1996). Spatial geometry and spatial ability–How to make solid geometry solid. The Annual Conference of Didactics of Mathematics, Munich, Germany.
  • Maiti, A., & Tripathy, B. (2012). Different platforms for remote laboratories in mobile devices. International Journal of Modern Education Computer Science, 4(5), 38-45.
  • Martín-Gutiérrez, J., Saorín, J. L., Contero, M., Alcañiz, M., Pérez-López, D. C., & Ortega, M. (2010). Design and validation of an augmented book for spatial abilities development in engineering students. Computers Graphics, 34(1), 77-91.
  • Matcha, W., & Rambli, D. R. A. (2011). Preliminary investigation on the use of augmented reality in collaborative learning. International Conference on Informatics Engineering and Information Science, Berlin, Heidelberg.
  • MoNE. (2013). Ortaokul matematik dersi (5-8. sınıflar) öğretim programı [Middle school mathematics course (5th-8th grades) curriculum]. Board of Education and Discipline.
  • NCTM. (1989). Curriculum and evaluation standards for school mathematics. National Council of Teachers of Mathematics.
  • Nieveen, N., & Folmer, E. (2013). Formative evaluation in educational design research. In J. Van den Akker, K. Gravemeijer, S. McKenney, & N. Nieveen (Eds.), Educational design research (pp. 152-169). Routledge.
  • Olkun, S. (2003). Making connections: Improving spatial abilities with engineering drawing activities. International Journal of Mathematics Teaching and Learning, 3(1), 1-10.
  • Pellegrino, J. W., & Kail, R. (1982). Process analices of spatial aptitude. In R. J. Sternberg (Ed.), Advances in the psychology of human intelligence (Vol. 1, pp. 311-365). Lawrance Erlbaum Associates.
  • Plomp, T. (2013). Educational design research: An introduction. In N. Nieveen & T. Plomp (Eds.), An introduction to educational design research (pp. 11-50). SLO.
  • Rafi, A., Samsudin, K. A., & Said, C. S. (2008). Training in spatial visualization: The effects of training method and gender. Educational Technology & Society, 11(3), 127-140.
  • Sack, J. J. (2013). Development of a top-view numeric coding teaching-learning trajectory within an elementary grades 3D visualization design research project. The Journal of Mathematical Behavior, 32(2), 183-196.
  • Sack, J., & van Niekerk, R. (2009). Developing the spatial operational capacity of young children using wooden cubes and dynamic simulation software. In T. Craine & R. Rubenstein (Eds.), Understanding geometry for a changing world: Seventy-first yearbook (pp. 141-154). National Council of Teachers of Mathematics.
  • Shelton, B. E. (2003). How augmented reality helps students learn dynamic spatial relationships [Doctoral dissertation, University of Washington]. Seattle.
  • Shelton, B. E., & Hedley, N. R. (2004). Exploring a cognitive basis for learning spatial relationships with augmented reality. Technology, Instruction, Cognition and Learning, 1(4), 323-357.
  • Sjölinder, M. (1998). Spatial cognition and environmental descriptions. Towards a framework for design and evaluation of navigation in electronic spaces.
  • Smith, B. L., & MacGregor, J. T. (1992). What is collaborative learning? In A. S. Goodsell, M. R. Maher, & V. Tinto (Eds.), Collaborative Learning: A Sourcebook for Higher Education (pp. 10-30). Syracuse University.
  • Stiles, J., & Stern, C. (2001). Developmental change in spatial cognitive processing: Complexity effects and block construction performance in preschool children. Journal of Cognition and Development, 2(2), 157-187.
  • Sugimoto, M., Hosoi, K., & Hashizume, H. (2004). Caretta: a system for supporting face-to-face collaboration by integrating personal and shared spaces. Proceedings of the SIGCHI conference on Human Factors in Computing Systems, New York, NY.
  • Sundberg, S. E. (1996). Effect of spatial training on spatial ability and mathematical achievement as compared to traditional geometry instruction [Doctoral dissertation, University of Missouri]. Kansas City.
  • Szalavári, Z., Schmalstieg, D., Fuhrmann, A., & Gervautz, M. (1998). “Studierstube”: An environment for collaboration in augmented reality. Virtual Reality, 3(1), 37-48.
  • Tartre, L. A. (1990). Spatial orientation skill and mathematical problem solving. Journal for Research in Mathematics Education, 21(3), 216-229.
  • Uygan, C., & Kurtuluş, A. (2016). Effects of teaching activities via Google Sketchup and concrete models on spatial skills of preservice mathematics teachers. Turkish Journal of Computer and Mathematics Education, 7(3), 510-535.
  • van Garderen, D. (2006). Spatial visualization, visual imagery, and mathematical problem solving of students with varying abilities. Journal of Learning Disabilities, 39(6), 496-506.
  • Wiesen, J. (2015). Barron’s mechanical aptitude and spatial relations test (3rd ed.). Barron’s Educational Series.
  • Wu, H.-K., Lee, S. W.-Y., Chang, H.-Y., & Liang, J.-C. (2013). Current status, opportunities and challenges of augmented reality in education. Computers and Education, 62(3), 41-49.
  • Yakimanskaya, I. S. (1991). The development of spatial thinking in school children. In P. S. Wilson & E. J. Davis (Eds.), Soviet studies in mathematics education (Vol. 5). National Council of Teachers of Mathematics.