Perceptions of Pre-Service Secondary Science Teachers on Inquiry-Based Science Education: An Analysis of the Demographic Variables

Cristina García-Ruiz 1 * , Teresa Lupión-Cobos 1, Ángel Blanco-López 1
More Detail
1 Department of Science Education, University of Málaga, Málaga, SPAIN
* Corresponding Author
EUR J SCI MATH ED, Volume 9, Issue 4, pp. 168-182.
OPEN ACCESS   87 Views   57 Downloads
Download Full Text (PDF)


Implementing the inquiry approach in the science classroom represents a challenge for pre-service secondary science teachers due to the perceptions they build around inquiry and determine their future teaching practice. In this work, we analyse the perceptions of 46 students of the science specialities of the Master’s Degree in Secondary Education Teaching, using the design of a questionnaire adapted from the PRIMAS project. The results obtained show some initial perceptions of the participants with a very homogeneous profile for the variables analysed, finding them favourable to the inquiry as a teaching approach, although showing some concrete difficulties. We also found some statistically significant differences regarding gender and previous academic and teaching experience. However, the prior research background associated with the science and technological degrees completed by the participants seemed not to affect their perception about inquiry. We finally raise some implications of the results obtained and give some orientation that might be useful for the initial training of secondary science teachers.


García-Ruiz, C., Lupión-Cobos, T., & Blanco-López, Á. (2021). Perceptions of Pre-Service Secondary Science Teachers on Inquiry-Based Science Education: An Analysis of the Demographic Variables. European Journal of Science and Mathematics Education, 9(4), 168-182.


  • Abd-El-Khalick, F., Boujaoude, S., Duschl, R., Lederman, N. G., Mamlok-Naaman, R., Hofstein, A., Niaz, M., Treagust, D., & Tuan, H. L. (2004). Inquiry in science education: international perspectives. Science Education, 88, 397-419.
  • Abril, A. M., Romero, M., Quesada, A., & García, F. J. (2014). Creencias del profesorado en ejercicio y en formación sobre el aprendizaje por investigación [Inquiry-based learning in secondary school: in-service and pre-service teachers’ believes]. Revista Eureka Sobre Enseñanza y Divulgación de las Ciencias, 11, 22-33.
  • Aguilera, D., Martín-Páez, T., Valdivia-Rodríguez, V., Ruiz-Delgado, Á., Williams-Pinto, L., Vílchez-González, J. M., & Perales-Palacios, F. J. (2018). La enseñanza de las ciencias basada en la indagación. Una revisión sistemática de la producción española [Inquiry-based science education. A systematic review of Spanish production]. Revista de Educacion, 381, 259-274.
  • Baykara, H., & Yakar, Z. (2020). Pre-service science teachers’ views about scientific inquiry: The case of Turkey and Taiwan. Turkish Online Journal of Qualitative Inquiry, 11(2), 161-192.
  • Binns, I. C., & Popp, S. (2013). Learning to teach science through inquiry: experiences of pre-service teachers. Electronic Journal of Science Education, 17, 1-24.
  • Boaventura, D., Faria, C., & Guilherme, E. (2020). Impact of an inquiry-based science activity about climate change on development of primary students’ investigation skills and conceptual knowledge. Interdisciplinary Journal of Environmental and Science Education, 16(4), e2225.
  • Çalik, M., Ebenezer, J., Özsevgeç, T., Küçük, Z., & Artun, H. (2015). Improving science student teachers’ self-perceptions of fluency with innovative technologies and scientific inquiry abilities. Journal of Science Education and Technology, 24(4), 448-460.
  • Chen, H. T., Wang, H. H., Lin, H. S., Lawrenz, F. P., & Hong, Z. R. (2014). Longitudinal study of an after-school, inquiry-based science intervention on low-achieving children’s affective perceptions of learning science. International Journal of Science Education, 36, 2133-2156.
  • Cian, H., Dsouza, N., Lyons, R., & Cook, M. (2017). Influences on the development of inquiry-based practices among pre-service teachers. Journal of Science Teacher Education, 28(2), 186-204.
  • Crawford, B. A. (2014). From inquiry to scientific practices in the science classroom. In N. G. Lederman & S. K. Abell (Eds.), Handbook of Research on Science Education. Routledge.
  • Elster, D., Barendziak, T., Haskamp, F., & Kastenholz, L. (2014). Raising standards through INQUIRE in pre-service teacher education. Science Education International, 25, 29-39.
  • Engeln, K., Euler, M., & Maass, K. (2013). Inquiry-based learning in mathematics and science: A comparative baseline study of teachers’ beliefs and practices across 12 European countries. ZDM - International Journal on Mathematics Education, 45(6), 823-836.
  • Fitzgerald, M., Danaia, L., & McKinnon, D. H. (2017). Barriers inhibiting inquiry-based science teaching and potential solutions: perceptions of positively inclined early adopters. Research in Science Education, 49, 543-566.
  • Franco-Mariscal, A. J. (2015). Competencias científicas en la enseñanza y el aprendizaje por investigación. Un estudio de caso sobre corrosión de metales en secundaria [Scientific competences in teaching and learning through research. A case study about the corrosion of metals in secondary education]. Enseñanza de las Ciencias, 33(2), 231.
  • Heindl, M. (2018). Inquiry-based learning and its possibilities for primary schools with fewer digital resources – a qualitative study. Pedagogical Research, 3(3), 1-8.
  • Herranen, J., Kousa, P., Fooladi, E., & Aksela, M. (2019). Inquiry as a context-based practice – a case study of pre-service teachers’ beliefs and implementation of inquiry in context-based science teaching. International Journal of Science Education, 41(14), 1977-1998.
  • Jiménez-Tenorio, N., & Oliva, J. M. (2016). Aproximación al estudio de las estrategias didácticas en ciencias experimentales en formación inicial del profesorado de Educación Secundaria: descripción de una experiencia [Approach to the study of didactic strategies in experimental sciences in initial training of secondary school teachers: description of an experience]. Revista Eureka Sobre Enseñanza y Divulgación de las Ciencias, 13, 121-136.
  • Krämer, P., Nessler, S. H., & Schlüter, K. (2015). Teacher students’ dilemmas when teaching science through inquiry. Research in Science and Technological Education, 33(3), 325-343.
  • Lederman, N. G., Lederman, J. S., & Antink, A. (2013). Nature of science and scientific inquiry as contexts for the learning of science and achievement of scientific literacy. International Journal of Education in Mathematics, Science and Technology, 1, 138-147.
  • Lotter, C. (2004). Pre-service science teachers’ concerns through classroom observations and student teaching: special focus on inquiry teaching. Science Educator, 13(1), 29-38.
  • Lotter, C., Harwood, W. S., & Bonner, J. J. (2006). Overcoming a learning bottleneck: inquiry professional development for secondary science teachers. Journal of Science Teacher Education, 17, 185-216.
  • Lumpe, A., Czerniak, C., Haney, J., & Beltyukova, S. (2012). Beliefs about teaching science: the relationship between elementary teachers’ participation in professional development and student achievement. International Journal of Science Education, 34, 153-166.
  • Maaß, K., & Engeln, K. (2014). Report on the large-scale survey about inquiry based learning and teaching in the European partner countries.
  • Mansour, N. (2015). science teachers’ views and stereotypes of religion, scientists and scientific research: a call for scientist–science teacher partnerships to promote inquiry-based learning. International Journal of Science Education, 37(11), 1767-1794.
  • Marshall, J. C., & Alston, D. M. (2014). Effective, sustained inquiry-based instruction promotes higher science proficiency among all groups: A 5-year analysis. Journal of Science Teacher Education, 25, 807-821.
  • McKeown, T. R., Abrams, L. M., Slattum, P. W., & Kirk, S. V. (2015). Enhancing teacher beliefs through an inquiry-based professional development program. Journal of Education in Science, Environment and Health, 2(1), 85.
  • Mesci, G., Schwartz, R. S., & Pleasants, B. A. S. (2020). Enabling factors of pre-service science teachers’ pedagogical content knowledge for nature of science and nature of scientific inquiry. Science and Education, 29, 263-297.
  • Minor, L. C., Onwuegbuzie, A. J., Witcher, A. E., & James, T. L. (2002). Pre-service teachers’ educational beliefs and their perceptions of characteristics of effective teachers. Journal of Educational Research, 96(2), 116-127.
  • Mong, C. J., & Ertmer, P. A. (2014). Examining the impact of a professional development course on stem teachers’ acceptance of and intent to implement problem-based learning. Dissertation Abstracts International Section A: Humanities and Social Sciences, 74.
  • Nuangchalerm, P. (2017). Relationship between preferred and actual opinions about inquiry-based instruction classroom. European Journal of Science and Mathematics Education, 5(1), 67-73.
  • Organisation for Economic Co-operation and Development [OECD]. (2019). TALIS 2018 results (Volume I): teachers and school leaders as lifelong learners.
  • Pedaste, M., Mäeots, M., Siiman, L. A., de Jong, T., van Riesen, S. A. N., Kamp, E. T., Manoli, C. C., Zacharia, Z. C., & Tsourlidaki, E. (2015). Phases of inquiry-based learning: definitions and the inquiry cycle. Educational Research Review, 14, 47-61.
  • Pérez, M. C. B., & Furman, M. (2016). What is a scientific experiment? The impact of a professional development course on teachers’ ability to design an inquiry-based science curriculum. International Journal of Environmental and Science Education, 11, 1387-1401.
  • Qablan, A. (2008). Why are we doing this? Preservice science teachers’ interpretations of the role of open inquiry in understanding teaching. Journal of Institutional Research, 14(1), 24-42.
  • Rodríguez-Arteche, I., & Martínez-Aznar, M. M. (2016a). Indagación y modelos didácticos: La reflexión de cuatro profesores de Física y Química en formación inicial [Inquiry and teaching models: reflection of four preservice Physics and Chemistry teachers]. Campo Abierto. Revista de Educación, 35, 145-160.
  • Rodríguez-Arteche, I., & Martínez-Aznar, M. M. (2016b). Introducing inquiry-based methodologies during initial secondary education teacher training using an open-ended problem about chemical change. Journal of Chemical Education, 93, 1528-1535.
  • Rodríguez-Arteche, I., & Martínez-Aznar, M. M. (2017). Contraposición de ideas sobre la indagación entre futuros profesores y estudiantes de secundaria. X Congreso Internacional Sobre Investigación en Didáctica de las Ciencias, 2937-2944.
  • Roehrig, G. H., & Luft, J. A. (2004). Constraints experienced by beginning secondary science teachers in implementing scientific inquiry lessons. International Journal of Science Education, 26, 3-24.
  • Romero-Ariza, M., Quesada, A., Abril, A. M., Sorensen, P., & Oliver, M. C. (2020). Highly recommended and poorly used: English and Spanish science teachers’ views of Inquiry-based Learning (IBL) and its enactment. Eurasia Journal of Mathematics, Science and Technology Education, 16(1), 1-16.
  • Rönnebeck, S., Bernholt, S., & Ropohl, M. (2016). Searching for a common ground. A literature review of empirical research on scientific inquiry activities. Studies in Science Education, 52(2), 161-197.
  • Rueda, J. A., Blanco, Á., España, E., & Brero, V. B. (2017). Justificaciones de profesorado de ciencias en formación inicial para la selección de actividades educativas. Influencia de una propuesta formativa [Preservice secondary science teachers’ justifications to select teaching and learning activities. Influence of a training proposal]. Profesorado, Revista de Currículum y Formación Del Profesorado, 23, 277-300.
  • Saldaña, J. (2009). The coding manual for qualitative researchers. SAGE.
  • Seroussi, D.-E., Yaffe, Y., & Sharon, R. (2017). “Careful, now you are both the learner and the teacher!”: student teachers’ evaluation of inquiry-based peer lecturing as a tool in teacher training. International Education Studies, 10(6), 100.
  • Silm, G., Tittsaar, K., Pedaste, M., Zacharia, Z. C., & Papaevripidou, M. (2015). Teacher’s readiness to use inquiry-based learning: an investigation of teachers’ sense of efficacy and attitudes toward inquiry-based learning. Science Education International, 28(4), 315-325.
  • Sjøberg, S. (2019). Critical Perspectives on Inquiry-Based Science Education (IBSE) in Europe. Position Paper Written for EUN Partnership, European Schoolnet, March.
  • Suters, L., Melear, C. T., & Hickok, L. G. (2002). Views of science teachers one-three years after a pre-service inquiry-based research course. Annual International Conference of the Association for the Education of Teachers in Science, 1-9.
  • Tiberghien, A., Badreddine, Z., & Cross, D. (2018). Designing teacher education and professional development activities for science learning. In O. E. Tsivitanidou, P. Gray, E. Rybska, L. Louca, & C. P. Constantinou (Eds.), Professional Development for Inquiry-Based Science Teaching and Learning (pp. 245-259). Springer.
  • Vidal, M., Yebra, M., & Membiela, P. (2017). Trabajando proyectos de indagación científica con estudiantes de bajo rendimiento académico. X Congreso Internacional Sobre Investigación en Didáctica de las Ciencias, 1485-1490.
  • Watters, J. J., & Diezmann, C. M. (2015). Challenges confronting career-changing beginning teachers: a qualitative study of professional scientist becoming science teachers. Journal of Science Teacher Education, 26(2), 163-192.
  • Windschitl, M. (2003). Inquiry projects in science teacher education: what can investigative experiences reveal about teacher thinking and eventual classroom practice? Science Education, 87(1), 112-143.
  • Windschitl, M. (2004). Folk theories of “inquiry:” How pre-service teachers reproduce the discourse and practices of an atheoretical scientific method. Journal of Research in Science Teaching, 41(5), 481-512.