Teacher Education and Didactics Knowledge to Teach Statistics: A Case Study

Bruna Mayara Batista Rodrigues 1 * , João Pedro da Ponte 1
More Detail
1 Institute of Education-University of Lisbon, PORTUGAL
* Corresponding Author
EUR J SCI MATH ED, Volume 10, Issue 2, pp. 225-242. https://doi.org/10.30935/scimath/11717
Published: 09 February 2022
OPEN ACCESS   1266 Views   854 Downloads
Download Full Text (PDF)

ABSTRACT

This article discusses how two beginning mathematics teachers mobilize and develop their didactics knowledge, specifically concerning knowledge of statistical content and teaching practice, during a teacher education experience. This work was developed as part of a specialization course for elementary school mathematics teachers, in the subjects Data Analysis I and II. The teacher education course took place in the West Zone of Rio de Janeiro, Brazil. This is a qualitative study with an interpretive paradigm, based on a case study with two beginning teachers. The data collected was obtained from sessions by a logbook, audio recordings, and interviews with the teachers after the teacher education course. The course was structured to articulate didactics and statistics knowledge from activities directed to teaching practice. Concerning statistical knowledge, the results show the development of knowledge about different concepts associated with carrying out statistical investigations. Regarding teaching practice, teacher’s learning is highlighted to carry out statistical activities of exploratory nature and statistical investigations in the school context.
Keywords: didactics knowledge, teacher education, statistical education, case study

CITATION

Rodrigues, B. M. B., & da Ponte, J. P. (2022). Teacher Education and Didactics Knowledge to Teach Statistics: A Case Study. European Journal of Science and Mathematics Education, 10(2), 225-242. https://doi.org/10.30935/scimath/11717

REFERENCES

  • Aikenhead, G. S. (1996). Science education: Border crossing into the subculture of science. Studies in Science Education, 27(1), 1-52. https://doi.org/10.1080/03057269608560077
  • Amado, J. (2017). Manual de investigação qualitativa em educação [Qualitative research handbook in education]. Imprensa da Universidade de Coimbra [University of Coimbra Press]. https://doi.org/10.14195/978-989-26-1390-1
  • Barbosa, G. C., Santos, S. S., Tinti, D. S., & Lopes, C. E. (2020). Análise de trajetórias de professores que ensinam probabilidade e estatística com auxílio do software IRAMUTEQ [Trajectory analysis of teachers who teach probability and statistics with the help of IRAMUTEQ software]. Jornal Internacional de Estudos em Educação Matemática [International Journal of Studies in Mathematics Education], 13(4), 420-428. https://doi.org/10.17921/2176-5634.2020v13n4p420-428
  • Bargagliotti, A., Franklin, C., Arnold, P., Gould, R., Johnson, S., Perez, L., & Spangler, D. (2020). Pre-K-12 guidelines for assessment and instruction in statistics education (GAISE) report II. American Statistical Association and National Council of Teachers of Mathematics. https://www.amstat.org/asa/files/pdfs/GAISE/GAISEIIPreK-12_Full.pdf
  • Batanero, C., & Díaz, C. (2010). Training teachers to teach statistics: What can we learn from research? Statistique et Enseignement [Statistics and Education], 1(1), 5-20.
  • Batanero, C., Burrill, G., & Reading, C. (2011). Overview: Challenges for teaching statistics in school mathematics and preparing mathematics teachers. In C. Batanero, G. Burrill, & C. Reading (Eds.), Teaching statistics in school mathematics: Challenges for teaching and teacher education (A joint ICMI/IASE study) (pp. 407-418). Springer. https://doi.org/10.1007/978-94-007-1131-0
  • Ben-Zvi, D. (2000). Toward understanding the role of technological tools in statistical learning. Mathematical Thinking and Learning, 2(1 & 2), 127-155. https://doi.org/10.1207/S15327833MTL0202_6
  • Borges, S. P., & de Carvalho, E. T. (2020). The role of the trainer in the continuing education process: Trainers or informants. Research, Society and Development, 9(3), 1-18. https://doi.org/10.33448/rsd-v9i7.3787
  • Brasil. (1997). Parâmetros curriculares nacionais: Matemática (Ensino fundamental) [National curriculum parameters: Mathematics (Elementary school).]. Brasília: Ministério da Educação. Secretaria de Educação Fundamental [Brasilia: Ministry of Education. Secretary of Elementary Education].
  • Brasil. (2017). Base Nacional Comum Curricular-Educação é a Base: Ensino Fundamental [National Curricular Common Base-Education is the Base: Elementary School]. Ministério da Educação [Ministry of Education].
  • Brown, L., Helliwell, T., & Coles, A. (2018). Working as mathematics teacher educators at the metalevel (to the focus of the teachers on developing their teaching). Spanish Society for Research in Mathematics Education, 13, 105-122. https://doi.org/10.35763/aiem.v0i13.230
  • Clarke, D. (2000). Time to reflect. Journal of Mathematics Teacher Education, 3(3), 201-203. https://doi.org/10.1023/A:1017398025800
  • Contreras, J. (2002). A autonomia de professores [The autonomy of teachers]. Cortez.
  • Costa, A., & Nacarato, A. (2011). A estocástica na formação do professor de matemática: Percepções de professores e de formadores [Stochastics in mathematics teacher education: Perceptions of teachers and trainers]. Bolema, 24(39), 367-386.
  • Crosswhite, F. J., Dossey, J. A., & Frye, S. M. (1989). NCTM standards for school mathematics: Visions for implementation. Journal for Research in Mathematics Education, 20(5), 513-522. https://doi.org/10.2307/749425
  • Etevam, E. J. G., Cyrino, M. C., & Oliveira, H. (2018). Desenvolvimento do conhecimento estatístico para ensinar a partir da análise de tarefas em uma comunidade de professores de matemática [Development of statistical knowledge to teach from task analysis in a community of mathematics teachers]. Revista de Ensino de Ciências e Matemática [Journal of Science and Mathematics Teaching], 9(2), 32-51. https://doi.org/10.26843/rencima.v9i2.1643
  • Franklin, C., & Kader, G. (2010). Models of teacher preparation designed around the GAISE framework. In C. Reading (Ed.), Proceedings of the 8th International Conference on Teaching Statistics. International Association for Statistics Education, Ljubljana (Slovenia).
  • Franklin, C., Bargagliotti, A., Case, C., Kader, G., Scheaffer, R., & Spangler, D. A. (2015). The statistical education of teachers. American Statistical Association.
  • Franklin, C., Kader, G., Mewborn, D., Moreno, J., Peck, R., Perry, M., Scheaffer, R. (2005). Guidelines for assessment and instruction in statistics education (GAISE) report. American Statistical Association.
  • Garfield, J., & Ben-Zvi, D. (2008). Developing students’ statistical reasoning: Connecting research and teaching practice. Springer.
  • Giordano, C. C., Araújo, J. R. A., & Coutinho, S. Q. S. (2019). Educação estatística e a base nacional comum curricular: O incentivo aos projetos [Statistical education and the common national curriculum base: Incentive to projects]. Revista Eletrônica de Educação Matemática [Electronic Magazine of Mathematics Education], 14, 1-20. https://doi.org/10.5007/1981-1322.2019.e62727
  • Gould, R. (2017). Data literacy is statistical literacy. Statistics Education Research Journal, 16, 22-25. https://doi.org/10.52041/serj.v16i1.209
  • Magen-Nagar, N. (2016). Examining teaching based on errors in mathematics amongst pupils with learning disabilities. European Journal of Science and Mathematics Education, 4(4), 506-522. https://doi.org/10.30935/scimath/9490
  • Oliveira, A. L., & Serrazina, L. (2002). A reflexão e o professor como investigador [Reflection and the teacher as researcher]. In GTI (Ed.), Reflectir e investigar sobre a prática profissional [Reflect and investigate professional practice]. APM.
  • Ponte, J. P. (2011). Preparing teachers to meet the challenges of statistics education. In C. Batanero, G. Burrill, & C. Reading (Eds.), Teaching statistics in school mathematics: Challenges for teaching and teacher education (A joint ICMI/IASE study) (pp. 299-309). Springer. https://doi.org/10.1007/978-94-007-1131-0_29
  • Ponte, J. P. (2012). Estudiando el conocimiento y el desarrollo profesional del profesorado de matemáticas [Studying the knowledge and professional development of mathematics teachers]. In N. Planas (Ed.), Teoría, crítica y práctica de la educación matemática [Theory, criticism and practice of mathematics education] (pp. 83-98). Graó.
  • Ponte, J. P., Mata-Pereira, J., Quaresma, M., & Velez, I. (2017). Formação de professores dos primeiros anos em articulação com o contexto de prática de ensino de matemática [Early years teacher training in conjunction with the context of mathematics teaching practice]. Revista Latinoamericana de Investigación en Matemática Educativa [Latin American Journal of Research in Educational Mathematics], 20(1), 71-94. https://doi.org/10.12802/relime.17.2013
  • Pratt, D., Davies, N., & Connor, D. (2011). The role of technology in teaching and learning statistics. In C. Batanero, G. Burrill, & C. Reading (Eds.), Teaching statistics in school mathematics: Challenges for teaching and teacher education (A joint ICMI/IASE study) (pp. 97-107). Springer. https://doi.org/10.1007/978-94-007-1131-0_13
  • Quintas, S., Ferreira, R., & Oliveira, H. (2015). O conhecimento didático de estatística de duas professoras de matemática sobre dados bivariados [The didactic knowledge of statistics of two mathematics teachers on bivariate data]. Bolema, 29(51), 284-306. https://doi.org/10.1590/1980-4415v29n51a15
  • Rodrigues, B. M. B., & Ponte, J. P. (2020). Desenvolvimento do conhecimento didático de professores em estatística: Uma experiência formativa [Development of teachers’ didactic knowledge in statistics: A formative experience]. Zetetike [Zetics], 28, 1-20. https://doi.org/10.20396/zet.v28i0.8656882
  • Sander, G., & Klein, F. (1987). Technology in a non-traditional learning environment. Learning in Higher Education, 4(1), 92-98.
  • Shulman, L. (1986). Those who understand: Knowledge growth on teaching. Educational Researcher, 15(2), 4-14. https://doi.org/10.3102/0013189X015002004
  • Smith, M. S. (2001). Practice-based professional development for teachers of mathematics. NCTM.
  • Sousa, O. (2002). Investigações estatísticas no 6º ano [Statistical investigations in the 6th grade]. In GTI (Ed.), Reflectir e investigar sobre a prática profissional [Reflect and investigate professional practice] (pp. 75-97). APM.
  • Stohl, H. (2005). Probability in teacher education and development. In G. Jones (Ed.), Exploring probability in schools: Challenges for teaching and learning (pp. 345-366). Springer. https://doi.org/10.1007/0-387-24530-8_15
  • Weiland, T. (2016). The importance of context in task selection. Teaching Statistics, 39(1), 20-25. https://doi.org/10.1111/test.12116
  • Weiland, T. (2017). Problematizing statistical literacy: An intersection of critical and statistical literacies. Educational Studies in Mathematics, 96(1), 33-47. https://doi.org/10.1007/s10649-017-9764-5