The Role of Knowledge and Epistemological Beliefs in Chemistry Teachers STEM Professional Development and Instructional Practices: Examination of STEM-Integrated Classrooms

Olubusayo Foluso Adebusuyi 1 * , Emmanuel Folorunso Bamidele 1, Adeola Samuel Adebusuyi 2
More Detail
1 Department of Science and Technology Education, Obafemi Awolowo University, Ile-Ife, Osun State, NIGERIA
2 Department of Psychology, Nigeria Police Academy, Wudil, Kano State, NIGERIA
* Corresponding Author
EUR J SCI MATH ED, Volume 10, Issue 2, pp. 243-255.
Published: 23 February 2022
OPEN ACCESS   705 Views   384 Downloads
Download Full Text (PDF)


The goal of this study is to examine the role of knowledge and epistemological beliefs in the relationship between STEM (science, technology, engineering, and mathematics) professional development programme (SPDP) and instructional practices in a longitudinal study. To achieve this goal, it first determined the relationship and impact of SPDP on the implementation of instructional practices by comparing two groups (experimental and control group) of chemistry teachers after two years SPDP in Ekiti State, Southwestern, Nigeria. Data were collected from 90 teachers after the programme at two different measurement points through chemistry STEM-integrated knowledge assessment, questionnaires, and classroom observation checklists. Data were analyzed using t-test, bivariate correlation and structural equation modeling (SEM). Results indicated that teachers in the experimental group scored higher than their counterpart in the other group on all measures of instructional practices at both time intervals. However, there was no significant difference on overall instructional practices at time 1 but given the time interval, a significant difference exists. Teachers’ participation in the SPDP was found to be highly correlated with STEM knowledge but weakly correlated with epistemological beliefs at time 1. Most importantly, STEM knowledge and epistemological beliefs mediated the relationship between SPDP and instructional practices at time 2. Implications for educational bodies, researchers, teachers and organizations planning to invest in teachers’ SPDP as well as recommendations for future research directions are discussed.


Adebusuyi, O. F., Bamidele, E. F., & Adebusuyi, A. S. (2022). The Role of Knowledge and Epistemological Beliefs in Chemistry Teachers STEM Professional Development and Instructional Practices: Examination of STEM-Integrated Classrooms. European Journal of Science and Mathematics Education, 10(2), 243-255.


  • Acar, D., Tertemiz, N., & Tasdemir, A. (2018). The effects of STEM training on the academic achievement of 4th graders in science and mathematics and their views on STEM training. International Electronic Journal of Elementary Education, 10(4), 505-513.
  • Acharya, K. P. (2019). Demystifying science teachers’ epistemic belief on chemical concepts: Students’ engagement in the school garden. Pedagogical Research, 4(4), em0044.
  • Adams, A. E., Miller, B. G., Saul, M., & Pegg, J. (2014). Supporting elementary pre-service teachers to teach STEM through place-based teaching and learning experiences. Electronic Journal of Science Education, 18(5), 1-22.
  • Aguilar-González, A., Muñoz-Catalán, M. C., & Carrillo, J. (2019). An example of connections between the mathematics teacher’s conceptions and specialised knowledge. EURASIA Journal of Mathematics, Science and Technology Education, 15(2), em1664.
  • Akaygun, S., & Aslan-Tutak, F. (2016). STEM images revealing STEM conceptions of pre-service chemistry and mathematics teachers. International Journal of Education in Mathematics, Science and Technology, 4(1), 56-71.
  • Aksit, N. (2007). Educational reform in Turkey. International Journal of Educational Development, 27(2), 129-137.
  • Al Salami, M. K., Makela, C. J., & de Miranda., M. A. (2017). Assessing changes in teachers’ attitudes toward interdisciplinary STEM teaching. International Journal of Technology and Design Education, 27, 63-88.
  • Al-Amoush, S., Usak, M., Erdogan, M., Markic, S., & Eilks, I. (2013). Pre-service and in-service teachers’ beliefs about teaching and learning chemistry in Turkey. European Journal of Teacher Education, 36(4), 464-479.
  • Barlow, A. T., Frick, T. M., Barker, H. L., & Phelp, A. J. (2014). Modeling instruction: The impact of professional development on instructional practices. Science Educator, 23(1), 14-26.
  • Bishaw, A. (2010). Teachers’ beliefs and actual practice of problem solving approach in teaching mathematics with particular reference to grades 9 and 10 in West Gojjam. Ethiopia Journal of Education & Science, 6(1), 73-87.
  • Chirume, S. (2017). Mathematics teachers’ perceptions and implementation levels of STEM education in their classrooms: A case study of eleven secondary schools in Gweru District, Zimbabwe. International Open and Distance Learning Journal, 2.
  • Corlu, M. S. (2012). A pathway to STEM education: Investigating pre-service mathematics and science teachers at Turkish universities in terms of their understanding of mathematics used in science [Doctoral dissertation, Texas A&M University].
  • Dasgupta, C., Magana, A. J., & Vieira, C. (2019). Investigating the affordances of a CAD enabled learning environment for promoting integrated STEM learning. Computers & Education, 129, 122-142.
  • Deng, F., Chai, C. S., Tsai, C. C., & Lee, M. H. (2014). The relationships among Chinese practicing teachers’ epistemic beliefs, pedagogical beliefs and their beliefs about the use of ICT. Journal of Educational Technology & Society, 17(2), 245-256.
  • Dong, Y., Wang, J., Yang, Y. & Kurup, P. M. (2020). Understanding intrinsic challenges to STEM instructional practices for Chinese teachers based on their beliefs and knowledge base. International Journal of STEM Education, 7, 47.
  • Du, W., Liu, D., Johnson, C. C., Sondergeld, T. A., Bolshakova, V. J., & Moore, T. J. (2019). The impact of integrated STEM professional development on teacher quality. School Science and Mathematics, 119, 105-114.
  • Gardner, K., Glassmeyer, D., & Worthy, R. (2019). Impacts of STEM professional development on teachers’ knowledge, self-efficacy, and practice. Frontiers in Education, 4(26).
  • Guskey, T. R. (2002). Professional development and teacher change. Teachers and Teaching: Theory and Practice, 8(3), 381-391.
  • Holzberger, D., Philipp, A., & Kunter, M. (2013). How teachers’ self-efficacy is related to instructional quality: A longitudinal analysis. Journal of Educational Psychology, 5(3), 774-786.
  • Jamal, S. N., Ibrahim, N. H., Surif, J., Suhairom, N., Abdullah, A. H., & Jumaat. N. F. (2017). Understanding of STEM education among chemistry teachers in district of Melaka Tengah. Man in India, 97(12), 101-108.
  • Kelley, T. R., & Knowles, J. G. (2016). A conceptual framework for integrated STEM education. International Journal of STEM Education, 3(1), 11.
  • Kurup, P. M., Li, X., Powell, G., & Brown, M. (2019). Building future primary teachers’ capacity in STEM: Based on the platform of beliefs, understandings and intentions. International journal of STEM Education, 6, 10.
  • Lin, K.-Y, & Williams, P. J. (2015). Taiwanese pre service teachers’ science, technology, engineering, and mathematics teaching intention. International Journal of Science and Mathematics Education, 14, 1021-1036.
  • Manu, J. (2014). An investigation on relationship between epistemological beliefs and instructional practice of preservice and in-service teachers. Theses and Dissertations, 1683.
  • Mcdonald, C. V. (2016). STEM education: A review of the contribution of the disciplines of science, technology, engineering and mathematics. Science Education International, 27(4), 530-569.
  • Nadelson, L. S., & Seifert, A. L. (2017). Integrated STEM defined: Contexts, challenges and the future. The Journal of Educational Research, 110(3), 221-223.
  • Parks, M. B., Hendryx, E. P., & Taylor, A. T. (2021). The study of stream litter accumulation as a model for cross-disciplinary, transformative, affordable, and scalable undergraduate research experiences in STEM. Interdisciplinary Journal of Environmental and Science Education, 17(3), e2245.
  • Polly, D., McGee, J. R., Wang, C., Lambert, R. G., Pugalee, D. K., & Johnson, S. (2013). The association between teachers’ beliefs, enacted practices, and student learning in mathematics. The Mathematics Educator, 22(2), 11-30.
  • Sallee, C. W., Edgar, D. W., & Johnson, D. M. (2013). student perceptions of instructional methods towards alternative energy education. Journal of Agricultural Education, 54(2), 130-142.
  • Sallee, C., Edgar, D., & Johnson, D. (2013). Student perceptions of instructional methods towards alternative energy education. Journal of Agricultural Education, 54(2), 130-142.
  • ‌Schommer, M. (1990). The effects of beliefs about the nature of knowledge on comprehension. Journal of Educational Psychology, 82, 498-504.
  • Schraw, G., & Olafson, L. (2003). Teachers’ epistemological world views and educational practices. Issues in Education, 8(2), 99-149.
  • Shahali, E. H., Halim, L., Rasul, S., Osman, K., Ikhsan, Z., & Rahim, F. (2015). Bitara-Stemtm training of trainers’ programme: Impact on trainers’ knowledge, beliefs, attitudes and efficacy towards integrated STEM teaching. Journal of Baltic Science Education, 14(1), 85-95.
  • Shernoff, D. J, Sinha, S., Bressler, D. M., & Ginsburg, L. (2017). Assessing education and professional development needs for the implementation of integrated approaches to STEM education. International Journal of STEM Education, 4, 13.
  • Smit, R., Weitzel, H., Blank, R. Rietz, F., Tardent, J., & Robin, N. (2017). Interplay of secondary pre-service teacher content knowledge (CK), pedagogical content knowledge (PCK) and attitudes regarding scientific inquiry teaching within teacher training. Research in Science & Technological Education, 35(4), 477-499.
  • Swan, M. (2007). The impact of task-based professional development on teachers’ practices and beliefs: A design research study. Journal of Mathematics Teacher Education, 10(4-6), 217-237.
  • Tanak, A., (2018). Designing TPACK-based course for preparing student teachers to teach science with technological pedagogical content knowledge. Kasetsart Journal of Social Sciences, 1-7.
  • Thibaut, L. Ceuppens, S., De Loof, H., De Meester, J., Goovaerts, L., Struyf, A., Boeve-de Pauw, J., Dehaene, W., Deprez, J., De Cock, M., Hellinckx, L., Knipprath, H., Langie, G., Struyven, K., de Velde, D., Petegem, P. V., & Depaepe, F. (2018). Integrated STEM education: A systematic review of instructional practices in secondary education. European Journal of STEM Education, 3(1), 02.
  • Thibaut, L., Knipprath, H., Dehaene, W., & Depaepe, F. (2018). Teachers’ attitudes toward teaching integrated STEM: The impact of personal background characteristics and school context. International Journal of Science and Mathematics Education, 17, 987-1007.
  • Thibaut, L., Knipprath, H., Dehaene, W., & Depaepe, F. (2018). The influence of teachers’ attitudes and school context on instructional practices in integrated STEM education. Journal of Teaching and Teacher Education, 71, 190-205.
  • Toropova, A., Johansson, S., & Myrberg, E. (2019). The role of teacher characteristics for student achievement in mathematics and student perceptions of instructional quality. Education Inquiry, 10(4), 275-299.
  • Tunc, C., & Bagceci, B. (2021). Teachers’ views of the implementation of STEM approach in secondary schools and the effects on students. Pedagogical Research, 6(1), em0085.
  • Walker, T. M., Spencer, T., Claiborne-Payton, S., & Whiteman, L. (2017). Putting theory into practice: An examination of preservice teachers’ beliefs about teaching science. International Journal for Cross-Disciplinary Subjects in Education, 8(3), 3151-3159.
  • ‌Wang, H., Moore, T. J., Roehrig, G. H., & Park, M. S. (2011). STEM integration: Teacher perceptions and practice. Journal of Pre-College Engineering Education Research, 1(2), 2.
  • White, R. T., & Arzi, H. J. (2005). Longitudinal studies: Designs, validity, practicality, and value. Research in Science Education, 35, 137-149.