A resources-oriented analysis of students’ reasoning about electromagnetic waves across contexts

Nurzhan Shilmurzayev 1 * , Aman Shakirov 2, Bayan Ualikhanova 1, Nuri Balta 3
More Detail
1 Faculty of Physics-Mathematics, South Kazakhstan Pedagogical University named after O. Zhanibekov, Shymkent, KAZAKHSTAN
2 Department of Mathematics, Physics and Informatics Teaching Methods, Faculty of Mathematics, Physics and Informatics, Abai Kazakh National Pedagogical University, Almaty, KAZAKHSTAN
3 School of Education and Humanities, SDU University, Almaty, KAZAKHSTAN
* Corresponding Author
EUR J SCI MATH ED, Volume 14, Issue 4, pp. 547-563. https://doi.org/10.30935/scimath/19090
Published: 06 August 2026
OPEN ACCESS   32 Views   15 Downloads
Download Full Text (PDF)

ABSTRACT

Understanding how students reason about electromagnetic waves (EMWs) remains a challenge in physics education. Rather than viewing student thinking as dominated by stable misconceptions, this study adopts a resources-oriented viewpoint to examine how students activate different conceptual ideas across contexts. Written responses from 37 students to five open-ended questions about EMWs were analyzed, with each answer treated as a student question unit. Through inductive coding, seven conceptual resources were found, including medium interaction reasoning, constancy of EMW speed reasoning, field-based wave generation, energy transfer to matter, and self-propagation in vacuum. A descriptive frequency analysis discovered strong context dependence on resource activation. Different resources consistently dominated different questions, with minimal overlap across contexts. Medium based reasoning was most prominent when comparing wave speeds in different materials, field-based reasoning dominated explanations of wave generation, energy-transfer reasoning dominated microwave-heating explanations, and vacuum-propagation reasoning dominated questions about spread in empty space. These patterns were recurring across many student responses. The findings show that students possess a repertoire of productive conceptual resources that are selectively activated rather than uniformly applied. This study stresses the importance of instructional approaches that support the coordination and refinement of students’ existing ideas across contexts.
Keywords: electromagnetic waves, conceptual resources, physics education research, context-dependent reasoning, student understanding

CITATION

Shilmurzayev, N., Shakirov, A., Ualikhanova, B., & Balta, N. (2026). A resources-oriented analysis of students’ reasoning about electromagnetic waves across contexts. European Journal of Science and Mathematics Education, 14(4), 547-563. https://doi.org/10.30935/scimath/19090

REFERENCES

  • Balta, N., Dzhapashov, N., Salibasic, D., & Mesic, V. (2022). Development of the high school wave optics test. Journal of Turkish Science Education, 19(1), 306-331. https://doi.org/10.36681/tused.2022.123
  • Barniol, P., & Zavala, G. (2016). The mechanical waves conceptual survey: An analysis of university students’ performance, and recommendations for instruction. Eurasia Journal of Mathematics, Science and Technology Education, 12(12), 2891-2905.
  • Born, M., & Wolf, E. (2013). Principles of optics: Electromagnetic theory of propagation, interference and diffraction of light. Miami University. http://www.cas.miamioh.edu/~meicenrd/anatomy/rr2.pdf
  • Cvenić, K. M., Ivanjek, L., Planinić, M., Jeličić, K., Sušac, A., Hopf, M., & Cindrić Brkić, M. (2023). Probing high school students’ understanding of interference and diffraction of light using standard wave optics experiments. Physical Review Physics Education Research, 19, Article 020118. https://doi.org/10.1103/PhysRevPhysEducRes.19.020118
  • Cvenić, K. M., Ivanjek, L., Planinić, M., Jeličić, K., Sušac, A., & Hopf, M. (2021). Analyzing high school students’ reasoning about polarization of light. Physical Review Physics Education Research, 17, Article 010136. https://doi.org/10.1103/PhysRevPhysEducRes.17.010136
  • diSessa, A. A. (1993). Toward an epistemology of physics. Cognition and Instruction, 10(2-3), 105-225. https://doi.org/10.1080/07370008.1985.9649008
  • Goodhew, L. M., Robertson, A. D., Heron, P. R. L., & Scherr, R. E. (2019). Student conceptual resources for understanding mechanical wave propagation. Physical Review Physics Education Research, 15(2), Article 020127. https://doi.org/10.1103/PhysRevPhysEducRes.15.020127
  • Gray, N. O. (2021). Student understanding of electromagnetic wave generation [Poster presentation]. The PER 2019 Conference.
  • Griffiths, D. J. (2017). Introduction to electrodynamics (4th ed.). Cambridge University Press. https://doi.org/10.1017/9781108333511
  • Hammer, D. (2000). Student resources for learning introductory physics. American Journal of Physics, 68(S1), S52-S59. https://doi.org/10.1119/1.19520
  • Hrepic, Z., Zollman, D. A., & Rebello, N. S. (2010). Identifying students’ mental models of sound propagation. Physical Review Physics Education Research, 6, Article 020114. https://doi.org/10.1103/PhysRevSTPER.6.020114
  • Jackson, J. D. (2021). Classical electrodynamics. John Wiley & Sons.
  • Kennedy, E. M., & de Bruyn, J. R. (2011). Understanding of mechanical waves among second-year physics majors. Canadian Journal of Physics, 89(11), 1155-1162. https://doi.org/10.1139/p11-113
  • Kotsis, K. T. (2024). The importance of teaching electromagnetic radiation interaction in high schools. Journal of Science Education Research, 8(2), 142-151. https://doi.org/10.21831/jser.v8i2.76537
  • Kryjevskaia, M., Stetzer, M. R., & Heron, P. R. L. (2012). Student understanding of wave behavior at a boundary. American Journal of Physics, 80(4), 339-347. https://doi.org/10.1119/1.3688220
  • Maloney, D. P., O’Kuma, T. L., Hieggelke, C. J., & Van Heuvelen, A. (2001). Surveying students’ conceptual knowledge of electricity and magnetism. American Journal of Physics, 69(S1), S12-S23. https://doi.org/10.1119/1.1371296
  • Mešić, V., Hajder, E., Neumann, K., & Erceg, N. (2016). Comparing different approaches to visualizing light waves. Physical Review Physics Education Research, 12, Article 010135. https://doi.org/10.1103/PhysRevPhysEducRes.12.010135
  • Pagiatakis, G., Voudoukis, N., & Uzunidis, D. (2021). Dealing with students’ misconceptions regarding propagation of electromagnetic waves. In Proceedings of the EDULEARN21. https://doi.org/10.21125/edulearn.2021.2087
  • Planinić, M., Jeličić, K., Cvenić, K. M., Sušac, A., Ivanjek, L., & Hopf, M. (2024). Effect of an inquiry-based teaching sequence on secondary school students’ understanding of wave optics. Physical Review Physics Education Research, 20, Article 010156. https://doi.org/10.1103/PhysRevPhysEducRes.20.010156
  • Podolefsky, N. S., & Finkelstein, N. D. (2007). Analogical scaffolding and the learning of abstract ideas in physics: An example from electromagnetic waves. Physical Review Physics Education Research, 3(1), Article 010109. https://doi.org/10.1103/PhysRevSTPER.3.010109
  • Ryan, Q. X., Wilcox, B. R., & Pollock, S. J. (2018). Student difficulties with boundary conditions in the context of electromagnetic waves. Physical Review Physics Education Research, 14(2), Article 020126. https://doi.org/10.1103/PhysRevPhysEducRes.14.020126
  • Saglam, M., & Millar, R. (2006). Upper high school students’ understanding of electromagnetic waves. International Journal of Science Education, 28(5), 543-566. https://doi.org/10.1080/09500690500339613
  • Salele, N., Khan, M. S. H., & Hasan, M. (2025). Exploring conceptions of electromagnetic wave propagation among microwave engineering students: A phenomenographic study. European Journal of Engineering Education, 50(5), 1052-1073. https://doi.org/10.1080/03043797.2025.2521330
  • Temes, J. B. (2021). Teaching electromagnetic waves to electrical engineering students: An abridged approach. In K. T. Selvan, & K. F. Warnick (Eds.), Teaching electromagnetics (pp. 183-194). CRC Press. https://doi.org/10.1201/9781003149231-9
  • Tongchai, A., Sharma, M. D., Johnston, I. D., Arayathanitkul, K., & Soankwan, C. (2009). Developing a conceptual survey in mechanical waves. International Journal of Science Education, 31(18), 2437-2457. https://doi.org/10.1080/09500690802389605
  • Tongchai, A., Sharma, M. D., Johnston, I. D., Arayathanitkul, K., & Soankwan, C. (2011). Consistency of students’ conceptions of wave propagation. Physical Review Physics Education Research, 7, Article 020101. https://doi.org/10.1103/PhysRevSTPER.7.020101
  • Tretter, T. (2014). Teaching electromagnetic waves used in communication technologies. Science Scope, 38(2), 78-89. https://doi.org/10.2505/4/ss14_038_02_78
  • Viennot, L., & Rainson, S. (1992). Students’ reasoning about the superposition of waves. International Journal of Science Education, 14(4), 475-487. https://doi.org/10.1080/0950069920140409
  • Wittmann, M. C. (2002). The object coordination class applied to wave pulses. International Journal of Science Education, 24(1), 97-118. https://doi.org/10.1080/09500690110066944
  • Wittmann, M. C., Steinberg, R. N., & Redish, E. F. (2003). Understanding and affecting student reasoning about sound waves. International Journal of Science Education, 25(8), 991-1013. https://doi.org/10.1080/09500690305024
  • Xie, L., Liu, Q., Lu, H., Wang, Q., Han, J., & Feng, X. M. (2021). Student knowledge integration in learning mechanical wave propagation. Physical Review Physics Education Research, 17, Article 020122. https://doi.org/10.1103/PhysRevPhysEducRes.17.020122