Creating School Scientific Communities Among Urban Refugee ELL Populations

Joseph A Johnson 1, Mihwa Park 2 *
More Detail
1 Department of Physics, Mercyhurst University, Erie, PA, USA
2 Department of Curriculum and Instruction, College of Education, Texas Tech University, Lubbock, TX, USA
* Corresponding Author
EUR J SCI MATH ED, Volume 10, Issue 1, pp. 87-103.
Published: 26 November 2021
OPEN ACCESS   583 Views   342 Downloads
Download Full Text (PDF)


Studies on English language learners (ELLs) and school science have been conducted from a range of theoretical and disciplinary perspectives, the findings of which have indicated growth in science achievement among ELLs when exposed to science inquiry. Yet studies are still needed to address the needs of specific groups within this large, and growing population. Children who are underserved in schools offering limited ELL support continue to be marginalized, and the gap for their future professional and higher education opportunities continues to grow when compared to their majority peers. Teachers often lack the experience, knowledge, and institutional support needed to address the complex educational needs of ELLs. The goal of this study was to examine aspects of multimodal science inquiry teaching strategies using technology with a specific group of students learning English as a new language. This paper describes a qualitative, autoethnographic, case study with three students from the Karen and Karenni cultures, coming to the United States from three different refugee camps in Thailand. Multiple data sources were collected throughout an year-long study, including videos of lessons, recorded focus groups, student artifacts, researcher field notes and reflections, and interviews with the classroom teachers. We coded data as emerging themes iteratively using HyperResearch qualitative research software. The study demonstrated how refugees ELL students developed their discourse skills and classroom engagements through the yearlong intervention designed to build trust between teacher and students by sharing responsibility for practice and learning, to involve inquiry-based science activities, and to value students’ communities and culture. The study was founded on the premise that students of diverse linguistic and cultural backgrounds can participate effectively in scientific inquiry.


Johnson, J. A., & Park, M. (2022). Creating School Scientific Communities Among Urban Refugee ELL Populations. European Journal of Science and Mathematics Education, 10(1), 87-103.


  • Ahmadi, D., & Reza, M. (2018). The use of technology in English language learning: A literature review. International Journal of Research in English Education, 3(2), 115-125.
  • Arkoudis, S. (2003). Teaching English as a second language in science classes: Incommensurate epistemologies? Language and Education, 17(3), 161-173.
  • August, D., & Hakuta, K. (Eds.). (1997). Improving schooling for language-minority children: A research agenda. National Academy Press.
  • August, D., Branum-Martin, L., Cardenas-Hagan, E., & Francis, D. J. (2009). The impact of an instructional intervention on the science and language learning of middle grade English language learners. Journal of Research on Educational Effectiveness, 2(4), 345-376.
  • Banchi, H., & Bell, R. (2008). The many levels of inquiry. Science and children, 46(2), 26-29.
  • Bransford, J. D., & Donovan, M. S. (2005). Scientific inquiry and how people learn. In M. S. Donovan, & J. D. Bransford (Eds.), How students learn: History, mathematics, and science in the classroom (pp. 397-420). National Academy Press.
  • Cosentino de Cohen, C., Deterding, N., & Clewell, B. C. (2005). Who’s left behind? Immigrant children in high- and low-LEP schools. Urban Institute.
  • Creswell, J. W. & Poth, C. N. (2018). Qualitative inquiry & research design: Choosing among the five approaches. (4th ed.) Thousand Oaks, CA: Sage Publications.
  • Cummins, J. (2001). Magic bullets and the fourth grade slump: Solutions from technology? NABE News, 25(1), 4-6.
  • Delpit, L. (1995). Other people’s children: Cultural conflict in the classroom. New Press.
  • Gay, G. (2000). Culturally responsive teaching: Theory, research, and practice. Teachers College Press.
  • Gee, J. P. (2005). Language in the science classroom: Academic social languages as the heart of school-based literacy. In R. Yerrick & W-M. Roth (Eds.), Establishing scientific classroom discourse communities: Multiple voices of teaching and learning research (pp. 19-37). Lawrence Erlbaum Associates.
  • Glasgow, N. A., Cheyne, M., & Yerrick, R. K. (2011). What successful science teachers do: 75 research-based strategies. Corwin Press Inc.
  • Green, T. (2005). Using technology to help English language students develop language skills: A home and school connection. Multicultural Education, 13(2), 56-59.
  • Harper, C., & de Jong, E. (2004). Misconceptions about teaching English Language Learners. Journal of Adolescent & Adult Literacy, 48(2), 152-162.
  • Hos, R. (2020). The lives, aspirations, and needs of refugee and immigrant students with interrupted formal education (SIFE) in a secondary newcomer program. Urban Education, 55(7), 1021-1044.
  • Iddings, A. C. D., & Jang, E. Y. (2008). The mediational role of classroom practices during the silent period: A new-immigrant student learning the English language in a mainstream classroom. TESOL Quarterly, 42(4), 567-590.
  • Janzen, J. (2008). Teaching English language learners in the content areas. Review of Educational research, 78(4), 1010-1038.
  • Jarrett, D. (1999). The inclusive classroom: Teaching mathematics and science to English-language learners. Northwest Regional Educational Laboratory.
  • Jiménez-Castellanos, O. H., & García, D. (2017). School expenditures and academic achievement differences between high-ELL-performing and low-ELL-performing high schools. Bilingual Research Journal, 40(3), 318-330.
  • Kang, S. H., & Dennis, J. R. (1995). The effects of computer-enhanced vocabulary lessons on achievement of ESL grade school children. Computers in the Schools, 11(3), 25-35.
  • Kessler, C., & Quinn, M. E. (1995). ESL and science learning. In J. A. Crandall (Ed.), ESL through content-area instruction (pp. 53-84). ERIC Clearinghouse.
  • Koehler, M., & Mishra, P. (2009). What is technological pedagogical content knowledge (TPACK)? Contemporary issues in technology and teacher education, 9(1), 60-70.
  • Lee, O. (2005). Science Education with English Language Learners: Synthesis and Research Agenda. Review of Educational Research, 75(4), 491-530.
  • Lee, O., & Buxton, C. A. (2013). Teacher professional development to improve science and literacy achievement of English language learners. Theory Into Practice, 52(2), 110-117.
  • Lee, O., & Luykx, A. (2007). Science education and student diversity: Race/ethnicity, language, culture, and socioeconomic status. In S. K. Abell & N. G. Lederman (Eds.), Handbook of research on science education (pp. 171-198). Lawrence Erlbaum Associates, Inc.
  • Liaw, M. L. (1997). An analysis of ESL children’s verbal interaction during computer book reading. Computers in the Schools, 13(3), 55-73.
  • Llosa, L., Lee, O., Jiang, F., Haas, A., O’Connor, C., Van Booven, C. D., & Kieffer, M. J. (2016). Impact of a large-scale science intervention focused on English language learners. American Educational Research Journal, 53(2), 395-424.
  • Lopez, O. S. (2010). The digital learning classroom: Improving English language learners’ academic success in mathematics and reading using interactive whiteboard technology. Computers & Education, 54(4), 901-915.
  • Lynch, S. (2000). Equity and science education reform. Lawrence Erlbaum.
  • McBrien, J. L. (2005). Educational needs and barriers for refugee students in the United States: A review of the literature. Review of Educational Research, 75(3), 329-364.
  • Michaels, S., & O’Connor, M. C. (1990). Literacy as reasoning within multiple discourses: Implications for policy and educational reform. Paper presented at the meeting of The Council of Chief State School Officers 1990 Summer Institute.
  • Ngo, B., Dyke, E., & LoBello, J. (2018). Connecting as “family” in educative relationships: Insights from a media program serving Hmong immigrant youth. Urban Education, 53(9), 1126-1153.
  • Noddings, N. (1997). Caring and interpersonal reasoning. Thinking for ethical action in families and communities, 40-48.
  • Oliveira, A. W., Weinburgh, M., McBride, E., Bobowski, T., & Shea, R. (2019). Teaching science to english language learners: Current research and practices in the field of science education. In L. C. de Oliveira (Ed.), The handbook of TESOL in K-12 (pp. 277-290). Wiley-Blackwell.
  • Portes, A., & Rumbaut, R. G. (2001). Legacies: The story of the immigrant second generation. University of California Press.
  • Rodriguez, A. J. (2015). What about a dimension of engagement, equity, and diversity practices? A critique of the next generation science standards. Journal of Research in Science Teaching, 52(7), 1031-1051.
  • Rodriguez, A., & Kitchen, R. S. (Eds.). (2005). Preparing prospective mathematics and science teachers to teach for diversity: Promising strategies for transformative action. Erlbaum.
  • Tan, E., & Barton, A. C. (2010). Transforming science learning and student participation in sixth grade science: A case study of a low-income, urban, racial minority classroom. Equity & Excellence in Education, 43(1), 38-55.
  • Villegas, A. M., Saizde La Mora, K., Martin, A. D., & Mills, T. (2018, April). Preparing future mainstream teachers to teach English language learners: A review of the empirical literature. The Educational Forum, 82(2), 138-155.
  • Zhou, M., & Bankston III, C. L. (2000). The biculturation of the Vietnamese student. ERIC Clearinghouse on Urban Education, 152, 1-7.