Enhancing elementary science learning through organic chemistry modeling and visualization

Daniel B. Fried 1 * , Pablo P.L. Tinio 2, Aaron Gubi 3, Jean P. Gaffney 4 5
More Detail
1 Department of Chemistry, Saint Peter’s University, Jersey City, New Jersey, USA
2 Department of Educational Foundations, Montclair State University, Montclair, New Jersey, USA
3 Department of Advanced Studies in Psychology, Kean University, Union, New Jersey, USA
4 Department of Natural Sciences, Baruch College City University of New York, New York, New York, USA
5 The Graduate Center Program in Biology, City University of New York, New York, New York, USA
* Corresponding Author
EUR J SCI MATH ED, Volume 7, Issue 2, pp. 73-82. https://doi.org/10.30935/scimath/9535
OPEN ACCESS   1779 Views   1038 Downloads
Download Full Text (PDF)

ABSTRACT

The scientists of the future will need to begin studying science in great depth, much earlier in life, in order to keep up with the accelerating pace of discovery and technological innovation. For this to be possible, engaging and child-friendly pedagogical approaches need to be developed that leverage the natural enthusiasm of young science learners, as many students lose interest in science well before they encounter the rich subject matter of high school and college. This study provides evidence that a specially-designed chemistry curriculum can allow students 8-11 years old to rapidly learn advanced material while motivating them. The curriculum adhered to a backward design strategy and utilized a visual approach to chemistry learning. It also featured extensive use of hand-held organic chemistry model building and computerized molecular modeling activities. The 5-session study involved 63 students from grades 3-5 from an economically disadvantaged urban school in New Jersey. Despite the technical nature of the program, student motivation for chemistry learning was high, and assessment results showed students’ high-level understanding of the material.

CITATION

Fried, D. B., Tinio, P. P., Gubi, A., & Gaffney, J. P. (2019). Enhancing elementary science learning through organic chemistry modeling and visualization. European Journal of Science and Mathematics Education, 7(2), 73-82. https://doi.org/10.30935/scimath/9535

REFERENCES

  • Childre, A., Sands, J. R., & Pope, S. T. (2009). Backward Design. Teaching Exceptional Children, 41(5), 6-14.
  • Clements, D. H., & Sarama, J. (2016). Math, science, and technology in the early grades. The Future of Children, 75-94.
  • Dori, Y. J., & Kaberman, Z. (2012). Assessing high school chemistry students’ modeling sub-skills in a computerized molecular modeling learning environment. Instructional Science, 40(1), 69-91. doi:10.1007/s11251-011-9172-7
  • Kali, Y., & Linn, M. C. (2008). Designing effective visualizations for elementary school science. The elementary school journal, 109(2), 181-198.
  • Long, J. F., Monoi, S., Harper, B., Knoblauch, D., & Murphy, P. K. (2007). Academic motivation and achievement among urban adolescents. Urban Education, 42, 196-222.
  • Metz, K. E. (2008). Narrowing the gulf between the practices of science and the elementary school science classroom. The Elementary School Journal, 109(2), 138-161.
  • National Academy of Sciences, National Academy of Engineering, and Institute of Medicine, Rising above the gathering storm: energizing and employing America for a brighter economic future (Washington, DC: The National Academies Press, 2007), pp. 1–591.
  • Nord, C., Roey, S., Perkins, R., Lyons, M., Lemanski, N., Brown, J., & Schuknecht, J. (2011). The Nation's Report Card [TM]: America's High School Graduates. Results of the 2009 NAEP High School Transcript Study. NCES 2011-462. National Center for Education Statistics.
  • PyMOL: The PyMOL Molecular Graphics System, Version 2.0 Schrödinger, LLC.
  • Spaulding, L. S., & Flannagan, J. S. (2012). DIS2ECT. Teaching Exceptional Children, 44(6), 6-14.
  • Vedder‐Weiss, D., & Fortus, D. (2012). Adolescents' declining motivation to learn science: A follow‐up study. Journal of Research in Science Teaching, 49(9), 1057-1095. doi:10.1002/tea.21049
  • Wu, H. K., & Shah, P. (2004). Exploring visuospatial thinking in chemistry learning. Science education, 88(3), 465-492.