Helping puzzle-solvers find solutions missed by a famous puzzle author: Initial study on stimulated creativity
More Detail
1 Facultad de Ciencias Físico Matemáticas Benemérita Universidad Autónoma de Puebla, Puebla, MEXICO
* Corresponding Author
EUR J SCI MATH ED, Volume 13, Issue 4, pp. 385-394.
https://doi.org/10.30935/scimath/17509
Published: 04 December 2025
OPEN ACCESS 10 Views 6 Downloads
ABSTRACT
Many matchstick puzzles have multiple solutions and are ideal learning tasks for fostering and improving creative thinking. Nevertheless, many puzzle book authors exhibit a strange approach toward these multiple-solution puzzles. For some puzzles, the number of solutions is mentioned after puzzle formulation and these solutions are published in solution section. For other puzzles, information about the number of solutions is omitted, and only one solution is published. Such authors’ behavior, certainly adverse to puzzle-solvers’ creativity, is illustrated with puzzle examples taken from two most successful books on matchstick puzzles. The first was published by Tromholt (1889), and the second was authored by Obermair (1975). To demonstrate that information about the number of solutions stimulates puzzle-solvers’ creative performance, in this initial small-scale study an arithmetic five-solution matchstick puzzle with Roman numerals was used. Its author Obermair (1975) published only one solution. This puzzle was given to three groups of students (N = 21), asking them to activate their creativity and to try find its five solutions. Students were allowed to manipulate the matchsticks. Thirteen students found Obermair’s (1975) solution, and, additionally, between one and four solutions that Obermair (1975) missed. Most of these students were helped by a verbal hint “think about all arithmetic operations.” Eight students did not find Obermair’s (1975) solution. Nevertheless, they found between two and four solutions unknown to Obermair (1975). Students’ reflections on this activity revealed that many gained a more positive view on their own creativity or puzzle-solving skills.
CITATION
Slisko, J. (2025). Helping puzzle-solvers find solutions missed by a famous puzzle author: Initial study on stimulated creativity.
European Journal of Science and Mathematics Education, 13(4), 385-394.
https://doi.org/10.30935/scimath/17509
REFERENCES
- Alencar, E. M., Fleith, D. D. S., Boruchovitch, E., & Borges, C. N. (2015). Creativity in elementary school: Inhibiting and facilitating factors according to school principals. Psicologia: Teoria e Pesquisa, 31(1), 105-114. https://doi.org/10.1590/0102-37722015011849105114
- Applebaum, M. (2025). Proof by play: Teaching the parity principle with math games and puzzles. Contemporary Mathematics and Science Education, 6(2), Article ep25017. https://doi.org/10.30935/conmaths/17404
- Bakst, A. (1954). Mathematical puzzles and pastimes. D. Van Nostrand Company.
- Braun, F. (1876). Der junge Mathematiker und Naturforscher [The young mathematician and natural scientist]. Verlag von Otto Spamer.
- Foster, N., & Schleicher, A. (2022). Assessing creative skills. Creative Education, 13(1), 1-29. https://doi.org/10.4236/ce.2022.131001
- Gao, Q., & Hall, A. (2024). Early childhood teachers’ beliefs about creativity and practices for fostering creativity: A review of recent literature. Early Childhood Education Journal. https://doi.org/10.1007/s10643-024-01816-4
- Hansell, S. (1981). 109 knifflige Streichholztricks [109 tricky matchstick tricks]. Otto Maier Verlag.
- Idika, M. I., & Oluwaseyi, M. P. (2024). The impact of puzzle game and video-based puzzle strategies on students’ achievement and retention in periodicity. Journal of Mathematics and Science Teacher, 4(2), Article em061. https://doi.org/10.29333/mathsciteacher/14366
- Jukić Matić, L., & Sliško, J. (2024). An empirical study of mathematical creativity and students’ opinions on multiple solution tasks. International Journal of Mathematical Education in Science and Technology, 55(9), 2170-2190. https://doi.org/10.1080/0020739X.2022.2129496
- Keeling, R. P., & Hersh, R. H. (2011).We’re losing our minds. Rethinking American higher education. Palgrave Macmillan. https://doi.org/10.1057/9781137001764
- Leikin, R. (2013). Evaluating mathematical creativity: The interplay between multiplicity and insight. Psychological Test and Assessment Modeling, 55(4), 385-400.
- Leire, A., Morais, M. F., Cortabarria, L., & Lorea, M. (2024). Barriers to personal creativity in Spanish and Portuguese university students. Educación XX1, 27(1), 81-104. https://doi.org/10.5944/educxx1.35761
- Levav-Waynberg, A., & Leikin, R. (2012). The role of multiple solution tasks in developing knowledge and creativity in geometry. The Journal of Mathematical Behavior, 31(1), 73-90. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.jmathb.2011.11.001
- Mittenzwey, L. (1880). Mathematische Kurzweil [Mathematical amusement]. Julius Klinkhardt.
- Nickerson, R. (2010). How to discourage creative thinking in the classroom. In R. Beghetto, & J. Kaufman (Eds.), Nurturing creativity in the classroom (pp. 1-5). Cambridge University Press. https://doi.org/10.1017/CBO9780511781629.002
- Obermair, G. (1975). Streichholz-Spielereien [Matchstick games]. Wilhelm Heyne Verlag.
- Obermair, G. (1983). Streichholz-Spielereien [Matchstick games]. Honeywell Bull Computer.
- Obermair, G. (1991). Streichholz-Spielereien [Matchstick games]. Wilhelm Heyne Verlag.
- Obermair, G. (2000). Streichholz-Spielereien [Matchstick games]. Falken Verlag.
- Pellegrino, J. W., & Hilton, M. L. (2012). Educating for life and work: Developing transferable knowledge and skills in the 21st century. National Academies Press.
- Rubenstein, L. D., McCoach, D. B., & Siegle, D. (2013). Teaching for creativity scales: An instrument to examine teachers’ perceptions of factors that allow for the teaching of creativity. Creativity Research Journal, 25(3), 324-334. https://doi.org/10.1080/10400419.2013.813807
- Trilling, B., & Fadel, C. (2009). 21st century skills: Learning for life in our times. Jossey-Bass.
- Tromholt, s. (1889). Streichholzspiele. Denksport und Kurzweil [Matchstick games. Brain teasers and entertainment] (1st ed.). Otto Spamer Verlag.
- Tromholt, S. (1892). Streichholzspiele. Denksport und Kurzweil [Matchstick games. Brain teasers and entertainment] (5th ed.). Otto Spamer Verlag.
- Troshin, V. (2022). Don’t mess around with matches. Litres (Published in Russian).
- Vincent-Lancrin, S. (2021). Skills for life. Fostering creativity. Inter-American Development Bank. https://doi.org/10.18235/0003742
- Weaver, J. (1992). Brain teasers. Watermill Press.
- Williams, B. (2013). Gymnastics for the brain. Matchstick puzzles. Salim Bouzekouk.
- World Economic Forum. (2023). Future of jobs report. World Economic Forum. https://www.weforum.org/publications/the-future-of-jobs-report-2023/