Middle school pre-service mathematics teachers' guidance for sixth grade students in problem solving process

Tangül Kabael 1 * , Betül Yayan 1
More Detail
1 Elementary Mathematics Education, Anadolu University, Eskişehir , Turkey
* Corresponding Author
EUR J SCI MATH ED, Volume 2, Issue 2A, pp. 118-121. https://doi.org/10.30935/scimath/9633
OPEN ACCESS   1625 Views   820 Downloads
Download Full Text (PDF)

ABSTRACT

The mathematics of the middle school has an important place in developing of algebraic thinking. Middle grades correspond to transition from arithmetic to algebra. According to Thompson and Smith (2007), quantitative reasoning provides a smooth transition from arithmetic reasoning to algebraic reasoning as a glue. Sixth grade and verbal problems are important in developing quantitative reasoning. On the other hand, As Harel (2008) emphasized, the important thing in problem solving is the ways of thinking rather than answering the problems correctly in school mathematics. Therefore, developing thinking ways of students is one of the responsibilities of mathematics teachers. This responsibility can get more difficult for pre-algebra students like sixth grade students. In this study, it was aimed to investigate pre-service middle school mathematics teachers’ guidance for sixth grade students in problem solving process. This is a qualitatively designed study in which the data was collected through 10 pre-services teachers’ clinical interviews with sixth grade middle school students. Data was analysed qualitatively by using content analysis technique. It was found that pre-service middle school mathematics teachers focused on students’ getting the result rather than guiding their thinking ways. The abstract should be typed here (maximum 250 words).
Keywords: problem solving, guidance of mathematics teachers, developing problem solving

CITATION

Kabael, T., & Yayan, B. (2014). Middle school pre-service mathematics teachers' guidance for sixth grade students in problem solving process. European Journal of Science and Mathematics Education, 2(2A), 118-121. https://doi.org/10.30935/scimath/9633

REFERENCES

  • Altun, M. (2000). İlköğretimde problem çözme öğretimi. Milli Eğitim Dergisi, 147, 27-33.
  • Altun, M. (2008). İlköğretim ikinci kademe (6, 7 ve 8. sınıflarda) matematik öğretimi. Alfa Yayınları, Bursa.
  • Day, R., & Jones, G. A. (1997). Building bridges to algebraic thinking. Mathematics Teaching in the Middle Schools, 2(4), 208-213.
  • De Corte, E. (2004). Mainstreams and perspectives in research on learning (mathematics) from instruction. Applied psychology, 53(2), 279-310.
  • Ellis, A. B. (2011). Algebra in the middle school: Developing functional relationships through quantitative reasoning. In J. Cai & E. Knuth (Eds.), Early algebraization: A global dialogue from multiple perspectives (pp. 215–238). Heidelberg, Germany: Springer.
  • English, L. D., Lesh, R., & Fennewald, T. (2008). Future directions and perspectives for problem solving research and curriculum development. In In M. Santillan (Ed.), Proceedings of the 11th International Congress on Mathematical Education (pp. 6-13), Monterrey, Mexico.
  • Harel, G. (2001). Pupa’s two complementary products: Taxonomy of students’ existing proof schemes and DNR-based Instruction. International Newsletter on de Teaching and Learning of Mathematical Proof, 1-12.
  • Harel, G. (2007). The DNR System as a conceptual framework for curriculum development and instruction. In R. Lesh, J. Kaput & E. Hamilton (Eds.), Foundations for the future in mathematics education (pp. 263-280). Mahwah, NJ: Erlbaum.
  • Harel, G., & Lim, K. H. (2004). Mathematics teachers’ knowledge base: Preliminary results. In M.J. Hoines & A.B. Fuglestad (Eds.), Proceedings of the 28th Conference of the International Group for the Psychology of Mathematics Education,(Vol. 3(3), pp. 25 – 32). Bergen, Norway.
  • Lopez-Real, F., & Lee, A.M.S. (2006). Encouraging the use of technology in problem-solving: Some examples from an initial teacher education programme, The International Journal for Technology in Mathematics Education, 13(1), 23-30.
  • Mayer, R. E., Lewis, A. B., & Hegarty, M. (1992). Mathematical misunderstandings: Qualitative reasoning about quantitative problems.Advances in psychology, 91, 137-153.
  • Moore, K. C. (2010). Relationships between quantitative reasoning and students’ problem solving behaviors. Proceedings of the Fourteenth Annual Conference on Research in Undergraduate Mathematics Education (pp. 298-313). Portland, OR: Portland State University.
  • Nathan, M. J., & Young, E. (1990). Thinking situationally: Results with an unintelligent tutor for word algebra problems. Computers in education, 425-430.
  • Pólya, G. (1945). How to solve it. Princeton. New Jersey: Princeton University.
  • Smith, J. P., & Thompson, P. W. (2007). Quantitative reasoning and the development of algebraic reasoning. In J. J. Kaput, D. W. Carraher, & M. L. Blanton (Eds.), Algebra in the early grades (pp. 95–132). New York: Lawrence Erlbaum
  • Sowder, L. (1988). Children’s solutions of story problems. Journal of Mathematical Behavior, 7, 227-238.