Profiling teachers based on their professional attitudes towards teaching responsible research and innovation

Miikka de Vocht 1 * , Antti Laherto 1
More Detail
1 Department of Physics, University of Helsinki, Helsinki, Finland
* Corresponding Author
EUR J SCI MATH ED, Volume 5, Issue 3, pp. 271-284. https://doi.org/10.30935/scimath/9511
OPEN ACCESS   704 Views   404 Downloads
Download Full Text (PDF)

ABSTRACT

In order to facilitate policy-driven reforms in science education, it is important to understand how teaching innovations diffuse among teachers and how that adoption process can be catalysed. Little is known about the set of attitudes that makes teachers early or late adopters. In this study, the Concerns-Based Adoption Model (C-BAM) was employed as a framework for analysing teachers’ interests, concerns, worries and enthusiasm. We argue that the questionnaire typically used with C-BAM suffers from a ceiling effect and has unbalanced variables. An improved version of the questionnaire was developed and implemented in the project IRRESISTIBLE with 180 science teachers in ten countries at all school levels. The case of educational innovation in this project was Responsible Research and Innovation (RRI), a concept offered by the EU for science education to orient towards socially and ethically sensitive and inclusive processes of science and technology. Using cluster analysis we found four concern profile types: the Carefree, the Pragmatic, the Uncertain and the Worried. With their relatively high positive interests, the Carefree and the Pragmatic profile types are most likely to be early adopters. The high number of Uncertain teachers calls for better conceptualization of RRI in the school context. Furthermore, teacher professional development and additional resources are needed if this innovation is to be diffused widely across European schools. The improved questionnaire provided elaborate information on teachers’ concerns and interests, and could help in understanding and facilitating other top-down educational reforms as well.

CITATION

Vocht, M. D., & Laherto, A. (2017). Profiling teachers based on their professional attitudes towards teaching responsible research and innovation. European Journal of Science and Mathematics Education, 5(3), 271-284. https://doi.org/10.30935/scimath/9511

REFERENCES

  • de Vocht, M. & Laherto, A. (in preparation). Profiling teachers based on their professional attitudes about teaching Responsible Research and Innovation. Manuscript in preparation.
  • de Vocht, M., Laherto, A. & Parchmann, I. (submitted). Exploring teachers’ concerns about bringing Responsible Research and Innovation to European science classrooms. Manuscript submitted for publication.
  • de Vocht, M., Laherto, A., Parchmann, I. (2015). Teachers’ concerns and interests about teaching of “Responsible Research and Innovation” - applying the Concerns-Based Adoption Model. In P. Hästö & H. Silfverberg (Eds.), Proceedings of the Annual symposium of the Finnish Mathematics and Science Education Research Association 2014 (pp. 103-114). Matematiikan ja luonnontieteiden opetuksen tutkimusseura.
  • Eagly, A. H. (1992). Uneven progress: Social psychology and the study of attitudes. Journal of Personality and Social Psychology, 63(5), 693-710.
  • Evers, W. J. G., Brouwers, A., & Tomic, W. (2002). Burnout and self-efficacy: A study on teachers’ beliefs when implementing an innovative educational system in the netherlands. British Journal of Educational Psychology, 72, 227-243.
  • Hair, J. F. J., Black, W. C., Babin, B. J., Anderson, R. E., & Tatham, R. L. (2006). Multivariate data analysis (6th ed.). New Jersey, United States: Pearson prentice hall.
  • Hall, G. E., George, A. A., & Rutherford, W. L. (1977). Measuring stages of concern about the innovation: a manual for use of the SoC questionnaire. Washington, DC: National Inst. of Education (DHEW).
  • Hollingshead, B. (2009). The concerns-based adoption model: A framework for examining implementation of a character education program. NASSP Bulletin, 93(3), 166-183.
  • Kwok, P. (2014). The role of context in teachers’ concerns about the implementation of an innovative curriculum. Teaching and Teacher Education, 38, 44-55.
  • Liu, Y. (2005). Concerns of teachers about technology integration in the USA. European Journal of Teacher Education, 28(1), 35.
  • Newhouse, C. P. (2001). Applying the concerns-based adoption model to research on computers in classrooms. Journal of Research on Computing in Education, 33(5)
  • Overbaugh, R., & Ruiling, L. (2008). The impact of a federally funded grant on a professional development program: Teachers' stages of concern toward technology integration. Journal of Computing in Teacher Education, 26(2), 45-55.
  • Rogers, E. M. (2003). Diffusion of innovations (5th ed.). New York, NY: Free Press.
  • Ruggiu, D. (2015). Anchoring european governance: Two versions of responsible research and innovation and EU fundamental rights as ‘Normative anchor points’. Nanoethics, 9, 217-235.
  • Sutcliffe, H. (2011). A report on responsible research and innovation European Commission.
  • Tunks, J., & Weller, K. (2009). Changing practice, changing minds, from arithmetical to algebraic thinking: An application of the concerns-based adoption model (CBAM). Educational Studies in Mathematics, 72, 161-183.
  • van Aalderen-Smeets, S. I., Walma van der Molen, J. H., & Asma, L. J. (2011). Primary teachers' attitudes toward science; A new theoretical framework. Science Education, 96(1), 1-22.
  • Xu, R., & Wunsch, D. C. (2009). Clustering. Oxford: Wiley-IEEE Press.