Self-efficacy beliefs of pre-service science teachers on fieldtrips

Ela Ayse Koksal 1 *
More Detail
1 Nigde Ömer Halisdemir University, Turkey
* Corresponding Author
EUR J SCI MATH ED, Volume 6, Issue 1, pp. 1-12. https://doi.org/10.30935/scimath/9518
OPEN ACCESS   1378 Views   956 Downloads
Download Full Text (PDF)

ABSTRACT

Science is comprised of theory and practical work and to study either part is not enough to understand the whole. Practical work such as observation and fieldtrips should be used to develop students’ inquiry skills as well as to support the theory. Teachers with high self-efficacy on fieldtrips will be more likely to use this technique. Self-efficacy can be described as the perception of individual capacity. When the teacher candidates and teachers are considered, self-efficacy beliefs affect teachers' classroom practices and teachers with a high self-efficacy level are more passionate about teaching. This study intended to construct a self-efficacy scale for pre-service science teachers on using field-trips. The study also aimed to determine whether these beliefs vary by gender, class, secondary school type, whether fieldtrip was used in high school and university courses. Survey design was used in this study and the population was determined as all science education students at Turkish universities. The sample consisted of all 265 students at Niğde Ömer Halisdemir University. Data were collected by administering the “Self-Efficacy Beliefs on Fieldtrip Scale” by Öztürk (2008) to 249 pre-service science teachers. The students’ responses were analysed in order to construct a self-efficacy scale. Item and scale analyses were done to assess the reliability of the scale and validity of the scores. Nonparametric tests were used to determine whether the beliefs differ according to those factors. Results showed that self-efficacy beliefs are multidimensional (consisted of task efficacy, coping with problems efficacy, teaching efficacy, and pre-visit actions efficacy); and pre-service teachers’ beliefs were positive except coping with problems efficacy. The results also revealed that efficacy beliefs of the pre-service science teachers differed with gender (for pre-visit actions efficacy girls had higher scores than boys), the class level (pre-service teachers at lower grades had high efficacy on pre-visit and task efficacy compared to those at higher grades), and whether fieldtrips were used in high school (for task efficacy pre-service teachers whose high school courses were taught with fieldtrips had higher scores than those whose high school courses were not taught with fieldtrips. On the other hand no significant differences were found among pre-service teachers on class level, secondary school type, and whether fieldtrips were used in university courses.
Keywords: science, fieldtrips, self-efficacy beliefs, pre-service teachers, gender difference

CITATION

Koksal, E. A. (2018). Self-efficacy beliefs of pre-service science teachers on fieldtrips. European Journal of Science and Mathematics Education, 6(1), 1-12. https://doi.org/10.30935/scimath/9518

REFERENCES

  • Açikgöz, M. (2006). Sosyal bilgiler öğretiminde gezi-gözlem ve inceleme yönteminin etkililiğinin incelenmesi (Master’s Thesis, Gazi University, 2006).
  • Ashton, K. R. (2001). The public image of psychologists: Development and validation of an attitudes toward psychologists scale (Doctoral Dissertation, Ohio State University, 2001), (UMI No, 3059195).
  • Ata, B. (2002). Müzelerle ve tarihî mekanlarla tarih öğretimi: tarih öğretmenlerinin “müze eğitimine” ilişkin görüşleri (Doctoral Dissertation. Gazi University, 2002).
  • Aykaç, N. (2011). Hayat bilgisi dersi öğretim programında kullanılan yöntem ve tekniklerin öğretmen görüşlerine göre değerlendirilmesi (Sinop ili örneği) [Evaluation of the methods and techniques used in knowledge of life course teaching program according to teacher opinions (Sinop case study)]. Kastamonu Eğitim Dergisi, 19, (1), 113-126.
  • Bandura, A., & Adams, N. E. (1977). Analysis of self-efficacy theory of behavioral change. Cognitive Therapy and Research, 1 (4), 287-310.
  • Bozdoğan, A. E., & Öztürk, Ç. (2008). Coğrafya ile ilişkili fen konularının öğretimine yönelik öz-yeterlilik inanç ölçeğinin geliştirilmesi [Improving of self – efficacy scale of geographyc coneptions embedded within ‘science’ course: A case for prospective science teachers] Necatibey Eğitim Fakültesi Elektronik Fen ve Matematik Eğitimi Dergisi Dergisi (EFMED) [Necatibey Faculty of Education Electronic Journal of Science and Mathematics Education], 2 (2), 66-81.
  • Cengiz, C., & Kabapınar, F. (2011). Evaluation of the field trips to environments for informal learning: Case of the ‘Energy Park’. Batı Anadolu Eğitim Dergisi [Western Anatolia Journal of Educational Science], 197-202.
  • Çeken, R. (2012). İlköğretim düzeyi öğrenci projelerinin biyoloji ile ilgili program dışı bilgiler yönünden içerik analizi [A content analysis of elementary student projects in terms of extra-curricular biological knowledge]. Necatibey Eğitim Fakültesi Elektronik Fen ve Matematik Eğitimi Dergisi (EFMED) [Necatibey Faculty of Education Electronic Journal of Science and Mathematics Education], 6(1), 55-66.
  • Demir, M., K. (2007).Sınıf öğretmeni adaylarının gözlem gezisi yöntemine bakış açılarının incelenmesi. GÜ, Gazi Eğitim Fakültesi Dergisi, 27 (3), 83-98.
  • Demir, M. K. (2009). Sınıf öğretmenlerinin gözlem gezilerine yönelik tutum ve görüşlerinin incelenmesi. Kastamonu Eğitim Dergisi, 17 (2), 467-478.
  • Dindar, H., & Yaman, S. (2002). Öğretmenlerin ilköğretim 4. ve 5. sınıflarda fen bilgisi dersinde öğretim yöntemlerini kullanma durumları. Kastamonu Eğitim Dergisi, 10 (1), 103-108.
  • Garson, D., G. (2009). “Reliability Analysis, Reliability Analysis: Statnotes from North Carolina State University, Public Administration Program” http://www2.chass.ncsu.edu/garson/pa765/reliab.htm. (accessed April 2017).
  • Gazel, A. A., & Yıldırım, R. (2014). İlköğretim II. kademe sosyal bilgiler derslerinde gezi-gözlem yönteminin uygulanma durumunun incelenmesi [Study of application for excursion observation method in primary school 2nd grade social studies]. Kuramsal Eğitimbilim Dergisi [Journal of Theoretical Educational Science], 7(2), 246-270.
  • George, D., & Mallery, P. (2003). SPSS for windows step by step: A simple guide and reference 11.0 update (4th ed.), Munich: Allyn & Bacon.
  • Gömleksiz, M. N., & Bulut, İ. (2007). Yeni Hayat Bilgisi Dersi Öğretim Programının Uygulamadaki Etkililiğinin Değerlendirilmesi, Millî Eğitim, 173, 67-88.
  • Güneş, T., & Demir, S. İlköğretim Müfredatındaki Hayat Bilgisi Derslerinin, Öğrencileri Fen Öğrenmeye Hazırlamadaki Etkileri. Hacettepe Üniversitesi Eğitim Fakültesi Dergisi, 33, 169-180, (2007).
  • Gür, G., Çakıroğlu, J., & Çapa Aydın, Y. (2012). Investigating predictors of sense of efficacy beliefs of classroom, science, and mathematics teachers. Eğitim ve Bilim [Education and Science], 37(166), 68-76.
  • Kaptan, F. (1999). Fen Bilgisi Öğretimi. İstanbul: Milli Eğiitm Bakanlığı.
  • Kubiszyn, T., & Borich, G. (2007). Educational testing and measurement: Classroom application and practice (8th ed,). Hoboken, New Jersey: John Wiley & Sons, Inc.
  • Mazman, F. (2007). Sosyal bilgiler eğitiminde gezi-gözlem metodunun uygulanmasına ilişkin bir araştırma (Tokat örneği) (Master’s Thesis, Gaziosmanpaşa University, 2007).
  • Mcmillan, J. H., & Schumacher, S. (2006). Research in education. Boston: Pearson Education Inc.,.
  • Mıhlandız, G., Duran, M., Işık, H., & Özdemir, O. (2011). The relationship between the pre-service science teachers’ self-efficacy beliefs about science teaching and laboratory works. Batı Anadolu Eğitm Dergisi [Western Anatolia Journal of Educational Science], 477-484.
  • Orion, N., & Hofstein, A. (1994). Factors that influence learning during a scientific field trip in a natural environment. Journal of Research in Science Teaching, 31(10), 1097–1119.
  • Özgen, N (2011). Fiziki coğrafya dersi öğretim metoduna farklı bir yaklaşım: gezi- gözlem destekli öğretim [A different approach to physical geography teaching method: Trip–Observation supported education]. Marmara Coğrafya Dergisi, (23), 373-388.
  • Öztürk, Ç. (2008). Coğrafya öğretiminde gezi-gözlem tekniğini kullanabilme öz-yeterlilik inanç ölçeğinin geliştirilmesi [Developing a scale of self-efficacy belief about using fieldtrip method in teaching of geography]. Ondokuz Mayıs Üniversitesi Eğitim Fakültesi Dergisi, 25, 13-23. http://www.pegem.net/dosyalar/dokuman/124565-20110819145941-25-13-cografya.pdf
  • Streule, M. J., & Craig, L. E. (2016). Social learning theories—An ımportant design consideration for geoscience fieldwork. Journal of Geoscience Education, 64 (2), 101–107.
  • Tatar, N., & Bağrıyanık, K. E. (2012). Fen ve teknoloji dersi öğretmenlerinin okul dışı eğitime yönelik görüģleri [Opinions of science and technology teachers about outdoor education]. İlköğretim Online [Elementary Education Online], 11(4), 883-896.
  • Tschannen-Moran, M., Woolfolk Hoy, A. & Hoy, W. K. (1998). Teacher efficacy: Its meaning and measure. Review of Educational Research, 68, 202 - 248.
  • Uitto, A., Juuti, K., Lavonen, J., & Meisalo, V. (2006). Students’ interest in biology and their out-of-school experiences. Journal of Biological Education, 40(3), 124-129.