Exploring science teachers’ pedagogical content knowledge based on instructional approaches used to teach force concepts
Maphole Marake 1 * ,
Loyiso Jita 1,
Maria Tsakeni 1 More Detail
1 University of the Free State, Bloemfontein, SOUTH AFRICA
* Corresponding Author
EUR J SCI MATH ED, Volume 14, Issue 1, pp. 68-84.
https://doi.org/10.30935/scimath/17624
Published: 22 December 2025
OPEN ACCESS 57 Views 26 Downloads
ABSTRACT
Teachers use personal pedagogical content knowledge to filter instructional approaches when teaching topics such as force concepts. Understanding teachers’ approaches when teaching is important because it provides a window into teachers’ knowledge base. This interpretive, qualitative multiple-case study aims to understand three physics teachers’ pedagogical content knowledge by examining their approaches to teaching force concepts. Data were collected through classroom observations, analysis of lesson plan books and post-observation interviews revealed that the teachers explained concepts with illustrations; described experiments and made demonstrations and teacher-dominated whole-class discussions. Although teachers’ lesson plans didn’t reveal pedagogical approaches, they demonstrated knowledge of science curriculum; how students understand science including instructional and assessment strategies. These findings imply that teachers’ lack of reflection-on practice may result in low-quality instruction and low students’ performance. It was concluded that teaching experience mediates teachers’ knowledge of relevant examples, questions to ask and activities to do.
CITATION
Marake, M., Jita, L., & Tsakeni, M. (2026). Exploring science teachers’ pedagogical content knowledge based on instructional approaches used to teach force concepts.
European Journal of Science and Mathematics Education, 14(1), 68-84.
https://doi.org/10.30935/scimath/17624
REFERENCES
- Akçay, N. O., & Doymuş K. (2012). The effects of group investigation and cooperative learning techniques applied in teaching force and motion subjects on students’ academic achievements. Journal of Educational Science Research, 2(1), 109-123.
- Aydin, S., Demirdöğen, B., Akin, F. N., Uzuntiryaki-Kondakci, E., & Tarkin, A. (2017). The nature and development of interaction among components of pedagogical content knowledge in practicum. Teaching and Teacher Education, 46, 37-50. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.tate.2014.10.008
- Azam, S. (2000). Locating personal pedagogical content knowledge of science teachers within stories of teaching force and motion. Eurasia Journal of Mathematics Science and Technology Education, 16(12), Article em1907. https://doi.org/10.29333/ejmste/8941
- Blom, A., Cao, X., Rasolonjatovo, A. H. D, & Kola-Edun, J. T. (2017). Job-ready graduates of secondary education in Botswana, Lesotho and Zambia: Reforming instruction, curriculum, assessment, and structure to teach vocational and 21st century skills: Conference version. World Bank Group. http://documents.worldbank.org/curated/en/297731506359700310/
- Bryce, T., & MacMillan, K. 2005). Encouraging conceptual change: The use of bridging analogies in the teaching of action-reaction forces and the “at rest” condition in physics. International Journal of Science Education, 27(6), 737-763. https://doi.org/10.1080/09500690500038132
- Cabello, V. M., Real, C., & Impedovo, M. A. (2019). Explanations in STEM areas: An analysis of representations through language in teacher education. Research in Science Education, 49, 1087-1106. https://doi.org/10.1007/s11165-019-9856-6
- Carlson, J. K., & Daehler, R. (2019). The refined consensus model of pedagogical content knowledge in science education. In A. Hume, R. Cooper, & A. Borowski (Eds.), Repositioning PCK in teachers’ professional knowledge (pp. 77-92). Springer. https://doi.org/10.1007/978-981-13-5898-2_2
- Carpendale, J., & Hume, A. (2019). Investigating practising science teachers’ pPCK and ePCK development as a result of collaborative CoRe design. In A. Hume, R. Cooper, & A. Borowski (Eds.), Repositioning PCK in teachers’ professional knowledge (pp. 77-92). Springer. https://doi.org/10.1007/978-981-13-5898-2_10
- Chan, K. K. H., & Hume, A. (2019). Towards a consensus model: Literature review of how science teachers’ pedagogical content knowledge is investigated. In A. Hume, R. Cooper, & A. Borowski (Eds.), Repositioning PCK in teachers’ professional knowledge (pp. 3-76). Springer. https://doi.org/10.1007/978-981-13-5898-2_1
- Clores, L. J., & España, R. C. N. (2023). Assessment of teachers’ instructional practices: Towards proposing an innovative instructional model for teaching learning material in chemistry. Journal of Practical Studies in Education, 4(4), 1-19. https://doi.org/10.46809/jpse.v4i4.69
- Cohen, L., Manion, L., & Morrison, K. (2007). Research methods in education. Routledge. https://doi.org/10.4324/9780203029053
- Crawford, B. A. (2018). Learning to teach science as inquiry in the rough and tumble of practice. Journal of Research in Science Teaching, 44(4), 613-642. https://doi.org/10.1002/tea.20157
- Creswell, J. W. (2012). Educational research: Planning, conducting and evaluating quantitative and qualitative research. Pearson.
- Dancy, M., & Henderson, C. (2007). Framework for articulating instructional practices and conceptions. Physical Review Physics Education Research, 3, Article 010103. https://doi.org/10.1103/PhysRevSTPER.3.010103
- Döş, B., Bay, B., Aslansoy, C., Tiryaki, B., Çetin, N., & Cevahir, D. (2019). An analysis of teachers’ questioning strategies. Educational Research and Reviews, 11(12), 2065-2078. https://doi.org/10.5897/ERR2016.3014
- Examinations Council of Lesotho. (2020). Lesotho general certificate of secondary education syllabus physical science 0181. Examinations Council of Lesotho. https://web.examscouncil.org.ls/uploads/Physical_Science_Syllabus_c16c28a348.pdf
- Fulmer, G. W., Liang, L. L., & Liu, X. (2017). Applying a force and motion learning progression over an extended time span using the force concept inventory. International Journal of Science Education, 36(17), 2918-2936. https://doi.org/10.1080/09500693.2014.939120
- Furwati, S., Sutopo, & Zubaidah, S. (2017). Conceptual understanding and representation quality on Newton’s laws through multi-representation learning. Jurnal Pendidikan Sains, 5(3), 80-88.
- Geelan, D. (2020). Physical science teacher skills in a conceptual explanation. Education Sciences, 10(1), Article 23. https://doi.org/10.3390/educsci10010023
- Gurcay, D., & Ferah, H. O. (2017). The effects of multiple intelligences based instruction on students’ physics achievement and attitudes. Journal of Baltic Science Education, 16(5), 666-677. https://doi.org/10.33225/jbse/17.16.666
- Hoffenberg, R., & Saxton, E. (2015). Scientific explanations: A comparative case study of teacher practice and student performance. Electronic Journal of Science Education, 19(5).
- Irmak, Ş., & Yılmaz Ergül, D. (2024). Instructional strategies in science education: A dual approach combining systematic review and secondary qualitative data analysis. e-Kafkas Journal of Educational Research, 11(4), 597-616. https://doi.org/10.30900/kafkasegt.1503657
- Irmer, M., Traub, D., Böhm, M., Förtsch, C., & Neuhaus, B. J. (2023). Using video-based simulations to foster pPCK/ePCK–New thoughts on the refined consensus model of PCK. Education Sciences, 13(3), Article 261. https://doi.org/10.3390/educsci13030261
- Khalaf, B. K., & Zin, Z. B. M. (2018). Traditional and inquiry-based learning pedagogy: A systematic critical review. International Journal of Instruction, 11(4), 545-564. https://doi.org/10.12973/iji.2018.11434a
- Kirya, K. R., Nuru, T. S., & Yadav, L. L. (2022). Conceptual understanding of force concepts in the Ugandan context: A thread assessing performance and misconceptions. Journal of Mathematics and Science Teacher, 2(1), Article em008. https://doi.org//10.29333/mathsciteacher/12049
- Koma, S., Mokuku, T., Makatjane, T. J., Black, C., & Sermeus, J. (2021). The effectiveness of teaching energy in secondary school using the “factory of ideas” teaching approach. African Journal of Research in Mathematics, Science and Technology Education, 25(1), 27-37. https://doi.org/10.1080/18117295.2021.1893006
- Lesotho Ministry of Education and Training. (2021). Lesotho basic education curriculum policy: Education for individual and social development. Ministry of Education and Training Leshoto. http://www.education.gov.ls/img/lesotho%20basic%20education%20curriculum%20policy.pdf
- Lestari, F., Saryantono, B., Syazali, M., Saregar, A., Madiyo, M., Jauhariyah, D., & Umam, R. (2019). Cooperative learning application with the method of network tree concept map: Based on Japanese learning system approach. Journal for the Education of Gifted Young Scientists, 7(1), 15-32. https://doi.org/10.17478/jegys.471466
- Liu, G., & Fang, N. (2016). Student misconceptions about force and acceleration in physics and engineering mechanics education. International Journal of Engineering Education, 32(1), 19-29.
- Loughran, J., Berry, M., & Mulhall, P. (2012). Understanding and developing science teachers’ pedagogical content knowledge. Sense Publishers. https://doi.org/10.1007/978-94-6091-821-6
- Magnusson, S., Krajcik, J., & Borko, H. (1999). Nature, sources, and development of pedagogical content knowledge for science teaching. In J. Gess-Newsome, & M. G. Lederman (Eds.), Examining pedagogical content knowledge (pp. 95-132). Kluwer Academic Publishers. https://doi.org/10.1007/0-306-47217-1_4
- Maharaj-Sharma, R., & Sharma, A. (2017). Analogies in physics teaching: Experiences of Trinidadian physics teachers. The Electronic Journal of Science & Mathematics Education, 21(4), 65-81.
- Mataka, L., & Taibu, R. (2020). A multistep inquiry approach to improve pre-service elementary teachers’ conceptual understanding. International Journal of Research in Education and Science, 6(1), 86-99. https://doi.org/10.46328/ijres.v6i1.677
- McNeill, K. L., & Krajcik, J. (2008). Inquiry and scientific explanations: Helping students use evidence and reasoning. In J. Luft, R. L. Bell, & J. Gess-Newsome (Eds.), Science as inquiry in the secondary setting (pp. 121-134). National Science Teaching Association.
- Morris, D. L. (2024). Reflections of a first-year chemistry teacher: Intersecting PCK, responsiveness, and inquiry instruction. Education Sciences, 14(1), Article 93. https://doi.org/10.3390/educsci14010093
- Mulhall, P., & Gunstone, R. (2008). Views about physics held by physics teachers with differing approaches to teaching physics. Research in Science Education, 38, 435-462. https://doi.org/10.1007/s11165-007-9057-6
- Omoruan, B. P., & Osadebe, P. U. (2020). Examining the influence of computer literacy and mathematics competency on pre-service teachers in Nigeria. International Journal of Education and Practice, 8(3), 511-517. https://doi.org/10.18488/journal.61.2020.83.511.517
- Papaevripidou, M., Irakleous, M., & Zacharia, Z. C. (2017). Using teachers’ inquiry-oriented curriculum materials as a means to examine their pedagogical design capacity and pedagogical content knowledge for inquiry-based learning. Science Education International, 28(4), 271-292.
- Park, S., & Chen, Y. C. (2012). Mapping out the integration of the components of pedagogical content knowledge (PCK): Examples from high school biology classrooms. Journal of Research in Science Education, 49(7), 922-941. https://doi.org/10.1002/tea.21022
- Park, S., & Oliver, J. S. (2008). Revisiting the conceptualisation of pedagogical content knowledge (PCK): PCK as a conceptual tool to understand teachers as professionals. Research in Science Education, 38, 261-284. https://doi.org/10.1007/s11165-007-9049-6
- Qhobela, M. (2012). Using argumentation as a strategy of promotion of talking science in a physics classroom: What are some of the challenges? US-China Education Review B 2, 163-172.
- Qhobela, M., & Moru, E. K. (2014). Examining secondary school physics teachers’ beliefs about teaching and classroom practices in Lesotho as a foundation for professional development. International Journal of Science and Mathematics Education, 12, 1367-1392. https://doi.org/10.1007/s10763-013-9445-5
- Rice, A. H., & Kitchel, T. (2016). Influence of knowledge of content and students on beginning agriculture teachers’ approaches to teaching content. Journal of Agricultural Education, 57(4), 86-100. https://doi.org/10.5032/jae.2016.04086
- Sæleset, J., & Friedrichsen, P. (2021). Pre-service science teachers’ pedagogical content knowledge: Integration of students’ understanding in science and instructional strategies. Eurasia Journal of Mathematics, Science and Technology Education, 17(5), Article em1965. https://doi.org/10.29333/ejmste/10859
- Sakaria, D.A., Maat, S. M. B., & Matore, M. E. E. (2023). Factors influencing mathematics teachers’ pedagogical content knowledge (PCK): A systematic review. Pegem Journal of Education and Instruction, 13(2), 1-14. https://doi.org/10.47750/pegegog.13.02.01
- Silm, G., Tiitsaar, K., Pedaste, M., Zacharia, Z. C., & Papaevripidou, M. (2017). Teachers’ readiness to use inquiry-based learning: An investigation of teachers’ sense of efficacy and attitudes toward inquiry-based learning. Science Education International, 28(4), 315-325.
- Soysal, Y. (2017). An exploration of the interactions among the components of an experienced elementary science teacher’s pedagogical content knowledge. Educational Studies, 44(1), 1-25. https://doi.org/10.1080/03055698.2017.1331839
- Spatz, V., Hopf, M., Wilhelm, T., Waltner, C., & Wiesner, H. (2020). Introduction to Newtonian mechanics via two-dimensional dynamics–The effects of a newly developed content structure on German middle school students. European Journal of Science and Mathematics Education, 8(2), 76-91. https://doi.org/10.30935/scimath/9548
- Subramaniam, K., Kirby, B., Harrel, P., & Long, C. (2017). Using concept maps to reveal prospective elementary teachers’ knowledge of buoyancy. Electronic Journal of Science Education, 23(2), 1-18.
- Süral, S. (2019). An examination of pre-service teachers’ competencies in lesson planning. Journal of Education and Training Studies, 7(3), 1-13. https://doi.org/10.11114/jets.v7i3.3902
- Tsakeni, M. (2019). Pre-service science teachers’ perceptions of how they learn to facilitate inquiry-based practical work [Paper presentation]. The European Science Education Research Association 13th Conference.
- Vosniadou, S. (2019). The development of students’ understanding of science. Frontiers in Education, 4. https://doi.org/10.3389/feduc.2019.00032
- Wagner, S., Kok, K., & Prieme, B. (2020). Measuring characteristics of explanations with element maps. Education Sciences, 10(2), Article 36. https://doi.org/10.3390/educsci10020036